![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tophat: segment-based junction search failed with err =-11 | jdanderson | Bioinformatics | 15 | 10-14-2017 07:47 AM |
Tophat error -segment-based junction search failled with err=1 | upadhyayanm | Bioinformatics | 24 | 06-21-2016 07:20 PM |
segment-based junction search failed | Wei-HD | Bioinformatics | 6 | 07-18-2013 03:58 AM |
yet another "Error: segment-based junction search failed with err = -9" | liux | Bioinformatics | 1 | 08-24-2010 10:48 AM |
Error: segment-based junction search failed with err = -9 | Albert Cheng | Bioinformatics | 1 | 08-19-2010 09:24 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: London Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi All,
I'm running into problems with Tophat; keep getting the following error:- Error: segment-based junction search failed with err =-6. This is HiSeq 100bp PE data. Any ideas? Cheers Steve ## [Mon Jul 18 16:27:43 2011] Beginning TopHat run (v1.3.1) ----------------------------------------------- [Mon Jul 18 16:27:43 2011] Preparing output location ./AST1.chr.9.tiling.bicep.smooth.muscle.july.2011/ [Mon Jul 18 16:27:43 2011] Checking for Bowtie index files [Mon Jul 18 16:27:43 2011] Checking for reference FASTA file [Mon Jul 18 16:27:43 2011] Checking for Bowtie Bowtie version: 0.12.7.0 [Mon Jul 18 16:27:43 2011] Checking for Samtools Samtools Version: 0.1.15 [Mon Jul 18 16:27:43 2011] Generating SAM header for /scratch/data/reference_genomes/human/human_g1k_v37 [Mon Jul 18 16:28:02 2011] Preparing reads format: fastq quality scale: phred33 (default) [Mon Jul 18 16:28:02 2011] Reading known junctions from GTF file Left reads: min. length=100, count=151802002 Right reads: min. length=100, count=151646210 [Mon Jul 18 19:11:17 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie [Mon Jul 18 21:11:50 2011] Processing bowtie hits [Mon Jul 18 23:05:38 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg1 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (1/4) [Tue Jul 19 02:45:12 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg2 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (2/4) [Tue Jul 19 06:18:55 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg3 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (3/4) [Tue Jul 19 09:49:52 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg4 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (4/4) [Tue Jul 19 13:22:18 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie [Tue Jul 19 15:00:03 2011] Processing bowtie hits [Tue Jul 19 16:53:27 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg1 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (1/4) [Tue Jul 19 21:01:46 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg2 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (2/4) [Wed Jul 20 00:52:22 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg3 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (3/4) [Wed Jul 20 04:31:58 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg4 against human_g1k_v37 with Bowtie (4/4) [Wed Jul 20 08:07:07 2011] Searching for junctions via segment mapping [FAILED] Error: segment-based junction search failed with err =-6 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Junior Member
Location: UAB (Birmingham, AL, USA) Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Any resolution to this? We're seeing the same error on HiSeq PE 50bp data - but only on some data sets (always the same reference genome). It's consistent for a particular read set - either always failing or always working.
Note: we're on 1.2.0, you're on 1.3.1. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: italy Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
|
![]()
have someone solved this issue? I am having the same error
~45M of reads PE, Bowtie 0.12.7.0, TopHat v1.3.1, samtools-0.1.16, reference g1k_v37 [Sat Nov 5 02:47:34 2011] Beginning TopHat run (v1.3.1) ----------------------------------------------- [Sat Nov 5 02:47:34 2011] Preparing output location ./ [Sat Nov 5 02:47:34 2011] Checking for Bowtie index files [Sat Nov 5 02:47:34 2011] Checking for reference FASTA file [Sat Nov 5 02:50:50 2011] Checking for Bowtie Bowtie version: 0.12.7.0 [Sat Nov 5 02:50:50 2011] Checking for Samtools Samtools Version: 0.1.16 [Sat Nov 5 02:50:50 2011] Generating SAM header for /SHARE/USERFS/els6/users/mpala/annotation/NCBI/human_g1k_v37/bowtie_index/genome [Sat Nov 5 02:53:01 2011] Preparing reads format: fastq quality scale: phred33 (default) [Sat Nov 5 02:53:01 2011] Reading known junctions from GTF file Left reads: min. length=36, count=43896506 Right reads: min. length=38, count=43849406 [Sat Nov 5 03:20:08 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads against genome with Bowtie [Sat Nov 5 04:03:32 2011] Processing bowtie hits [Sat Nov 5 04:42:00 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg1 against genome with Bowtie (1/2) [Sat Nov 5 05:15:39 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg2 against genome with Bowtie (2/2) [Sat Nov 5 05:49:00 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads against genome with Bowtie [Sat Nov 5 06:28:18 2011] Processing bowtie hits [Sat Nov 5 07:08:43 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg1 against genome with Bowtie (1/2) [Sat Nov 5 07:53:55 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg2 against genome with Bowtie (2/2) [Sat Nov 5 08:46:16 2011] Searching for junctions via segment mapping [FAILED] Error: segment-based junction search failed with err =-6 M. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: Canada Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 124
|
![]()
I'm getting the same error. I'm using the command
Code:
tophat -p 6 --butterfly-search --no-convert-bam ~/chip/bowtie/indexes/mm9all+ ~/chip/data/E14_c_reads1.fastq ~/chip/data/E14_c_reads2.fastq Code:
[Wed Nov 16 23:58:28 2011] Beginning TopHat run (v1.3.3) ----------------------------------------------- [Wed Nov 16 23:58:28 2011] Preparing output location ./tophat_out/ [Wed Nov 16 23:58:28 2011] Checking for Bowtie index files [Wed Nov 16 23:58:28 2011] Checking for reference FASTA file [Wed Nov 16 23:58:28 2011] Checking for Bowtie Bowtie version: 0.12.7.0 [Wed Nov 16 23:58:28 2011] Checking for Samtools Samtools Version: 0.1.18 [Wed Nov 16 23:58:28 2011] Generating SAM header for /home/mike/chip/bowtie/indexes/mm9all+ [Wed Nov 16 23:58:31 2011] Preparing reads format: fastq quality scale: phred33 (default) Left reads: min. length=100, count=33713874 Right reads: min. length=100, count=33708045 [Thu Nov 17 00:27:42 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads against mm9all+ with Bowtie [Thu Nov 17 00:56:53 2011] Processing bowtie hits [Thu Nov 17 01:24:46 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg1 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (1/4) [Thu Nov 17 01:57:03 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg2 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (2/4) [Thu Nov 17 02:29:33 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg3 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (3/4) [Thu Nov 17 03:04:10 2011] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg4 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (4/4) [Thu Nov 17 03:35:00 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads against mm9all+ with Bowtie [Thu Nov 17 04:02:48 2011] Processing bowtie hits [Thu Nov 17 04:30:51 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg1 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (1/4) [Thu Nov 17 05:06:11 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg2 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (2/4) [Thu Nov 17 05:42:10 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg3 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (3/4) [Thu Nov 17 06:20:41 2011] Mapping right_kept_reads_seg4 against mm9all+ with Bowtie (4/4) [Thu Nov 17 06:54:57 2011] Searching for junctions via segment mapping [FAILED] Error: segment-based junction search failed with err =-6 Code:
>> Performing butterfly-search: Recording coverage islands Found 11562195 islands covering 532250647 bases Collecting potential splice sites in islands terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' what(): std::bad_alloc Last edited by biznatch; 11-17-2011 at 08:27 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Junior Member
Location: China Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
|
![]() Quote:
HI, have you solved the problem already? If so, could you give me some advice, for I met the same problem when running tophat. Thank you very much! Best wishes! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Location: Freiburg Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 56
|
![]()
I had the same problem with two out of 32 samples I mapped. I never figured out what was causing it, but updating TopHat to the most recent version (2.0.8) solved the problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Junior Member
Location: China Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
|
![]() Quote:
I installed the new tophat v2.0.8, and built new bowtie2 index and ran my sample again with the same command line order: tophat -p 8 -G Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.68.gtf -o 22_thout genome 22-1.fastq 22-2.fastq but I got another error here: 2013-02-28 09:16:30] Beginning TopHat run (v2.0.8) ----------------------------------------------- [2013-02-28 09:16:30] Checking for Bowtie Bowtie version: 2.0.5.0 [2013-02-28 09:16:30] Checking for Samtools Samtools version: 0.1.18.0 [2013-02-28 09:16:30] Checking for Bowtie index files Warning: we do not recommend to have both Bowtie1 and Bowtie2 indexes in the same directory the genome sequence (*.fa) may not be compatible with one of them [2013-02-28 09:16:30] Checking for reference FASTA file [2013-02-28 09:16:30] Generating SAM header for /media/RAID/work/lixinna/raw_data/2012-08-16-tumor-RNA-seq/experiment/genome format: fastq quality scale: phred33 (default) [2013-02-28 09:16:32] Reading known junctions from GTF file [2013-02-28 09:16:43] Preparing reads [FAILED] Error running 'prep_reads' prep_reads [--filter-multi <multi.fq>] <reads1.fa/fq,...,readsN.fa/fq> I still can't figure out the solution, could you give me some advice? Thank you in advance. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Location: canada Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi there,
I had the same problem with my samples and figured it is just a memory issue. If you are running tophat with option -coverage-search on, you need more than 40 GB of RAM available to tophat. However, If your read length is > 48bp, you do not need coverage search. Turn it off by --no-coverage-search in your command. Tophat works much faster and with no error. :-) Good luck, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Junior Member
Location: China Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you very much. I update the tophat version and the problem dispearred. So it may be a bug. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
error, junction search failed, tophat |
Thread Tools | |
|
|