![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ampure versus Ampure XP | seqgirl123 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 49 | 03-19-2015 04:02 AM |
CHI's Innovative Tissue-Based Diagnostics: Decoding Cancer & Other Maladies | Pavolga | Events / Conferences | 0 | 02-10-2012 07:23 AM |
Innovative Solutions for Targeted Amplification in Next-Generation Sequencing | mmb | Events / Conferences | 0 | 07-26-2011 05:02 PM |
You Determine the Next Innovative Technology | kevotu | General | 3 | 11-02-2010 09:00 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Ann Arbor, MI Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 36
|
![]()
Today we were visited by folks from Innovative Solution who were promoting their PCRClean and DNA SizeSelect purification kits. They claim that side-by-side with AMPure, we would get far better results with their kits. The PCRClean will remove any fragments less than 120 bp. And their DNA SizeSelector-454 are designed to retain greater than 500 bp. Has anyone tried these products yet? And if so, can you provide feedback?
Website to view products: http://stores.alinebio.com/-strse-DN...Categories.bok ![]() Last edited by suefo; 10-14-2011 at 11:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: St. Louis Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
|
![]()
I get excellent results from Ampure so I find it hard to believe you can get far better results from any other system. I'll be interested to hear about this too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
--Site Admin--
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,358
|
![]()
It has a higher range of size selection (above 1kb), but it more challenging to use for automation as the beads settle out of the less viscous solution.
I have limited experience with it, seems like it could be beneficial for larger insert gel-free protocols. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|