![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A first look at Illumina’s new NextSeq 500 | AllSeq | Vendor Forum | 111 | 03-12-2020 03:25 AM |
NextSeq 500 and HiSeq X Ten Services Coming Soon to Genohub.com | Genohub | Vendor Forum | 11 | 04-22-2014 09:46 AM |
Comparison between SOLiD, Illumina MiSeq and Illumina HiSeq | NGS_New_User | SOLiD | 0 | 12-12-2012 12:37 PM |
bowtie command line for Illumina Hiseq 2000 with Illumina 1.5+ quality encoding files | rworthi | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 09-28-2011 12:25 PM |
Have someone use the Misonix 4000 for solexa | allwayscjh | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 12-07-2010 02:05 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: Oklahoma Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 411
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Location: Walnut Creek, CA Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,707
|
![]()
Any idea if the HS4000/5000 are using 4-color or 2-color chemistry?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: Oklahoma Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 411
|
![]()
I think that's Nextseq only?
Looks to me like they've just stuck HiseqX-style flowcells in the 2500 system. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Location: Walnut Creek, CA Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,707
|
![]()
Except that I'm pretty sure the X-series do use 2-dye chemistry, the same as NextSeq...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,080
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: Oklahoma Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 411
|
![]()
Can't find any literature that says anything other than the Nextseq uses 2 colors. In fact, isn't this why the Nextseq currently has GC problems? Haven't heard anything about that with the HiseqX...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Location: Oklahoma Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 411
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Rick Westerman
Location: Purdue University, Indiana, USA Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,104
|
![]()
New toys for one person is a funding/migration headache for another. Especially if there is no upgrade path. :-(
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
--Site Admin--
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,358
|
![]()
Made the title more explicit and promoted to the front page...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Vendor
Location: Eugene, OR Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 521
|
![]()
This http://blog.illumina.com/blog/illumi...eq-4000-system says the 4000 uses 4-color.
This http://www.illumina.com/content/dam/...0-2014-057.pdf says that 1 flowcell does 50 transcriptomes per run at 50M reads each, so that is >300M reads per lane. Looks faster as well, if the longest run time is 3.5 days (not sure if that would be for 1x150bp or 2x150bp).
__________________
Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
There are data from PCR-free, RNA-Seq and NRC libraries sequenced on HiSeq 4000 in BaseSpace.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered Vendor
Location: Eugene, OR Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 521
|
![]()
Heard from someone that the cluster and reagent kits are similar in price to current Hiseq 2000 reagents, which would mean the price per read is quite a bit lower.
__________________
Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Location: Wageningen, Netherlands Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 21
|
![]()
#SNPsaurus:
I assume it will be 2x 150 bp in 3.5 days. 2.1 to 2.5 billion clusters per flow cell, in a 2x150 bp run is 630 - 750 Gb. With a speed >200Gb per day a 2x 150 bp run will take 3.5 days. I wonder if we can upgrade the 2500 V4 machine to a 4000 version... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Location: USA, Midwest Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,178
|
![]()
It looks to me that the 3000/4000 only accept 8 lane flow cells (high-output). If true then the trade off for throughput is flexibility.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Location: Bay area Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 77
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Registered Vendor
Location: San Diego, CA Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 138
|
![]()
The X series uses the standard 4-dye chemistry. NextSeq is the only one to use 2-dye. (And the one that people seem to be having the most problems with in terms of quality...)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,080
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Epigenomics NGS Beast
Location: New Jersey Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Pretty sure they will initially only support 2x125 in 3.5 days
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Registered Vendor
Location: genohub.com Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 210
|
![]()
"The 3000 is to the 4000 as the 1000 was to the 2000 and the 1500 to the 2500" Nice summary here: https://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/...00-in-context/
- Genohub |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered Vendor
Location: Eugene, OR Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 521
|
![]()
The one difference with these machines is the throughput. A university facility needed 2 flow cells that could be run independently to help manage a queue, since a paired end run would be almost two weeks (less now). But if most runs are 1-3 days, then that is less of a problem. I suspect the 3000 won't be substantially cheaper so it won't be appealing since you might as well get twice the capacity for a little extra, but some of the other reasons are less important for these machines.
__________________
Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|