Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Primescript Reverse Transcriptase Not Working plyguy69 RNA Sequencing 3 09-26-2016 03:05 PM
Which nucleotide does the reverse transcriptase stop at in SHAPE reaction? huiyecao062 RNA Sequencing 0 03-27-2015 07:30 AM
Wouldn't an RNase+ reverse transcriptase give better library representation? lcarey Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 05-16-2012 10:20 PM
PubMed: Single-molecule direct RNA sequencing without cDNA synthesis. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 10-01-2011 03:00 AM
PubMed: Development of a novel real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR method for the det Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-12-2009 06:00 AM

Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2017, 08:21 PM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Seattle

Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 3
Default Reverse Transcriptase of choice for single cell cDNA synthesis

Superscript III, Maxima H-?

Its difficult to parse out the differences between many of the commercially-available M-MuLV RTs. Does anyone have opinions or thoughts on their preferred enzymes?
microliter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2017, 04:43 AM   #2
Location: Montpellier (France)

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 93

You can take a look at this post:
It might be helpfull.
huguesparri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2017, 02:42 PM   #3
Junior Member
Location: Seattle

Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 3

perfect. thank you
microliter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:18 AM   #4
Senior Member
Location: Bay Area

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 118

That thread specifically covers the SMART-Seq2 protocol, so there might be other considerations depending on what method you're planning on using. The recommendations there will be appropriate for template-switching based protocols, but possibly not homopolymer tailing (Tang, Quartz-Seq) or Eberwine (CEL-Seq(2)) based amplification. For example, SSIII has better thermostability and overall RT efficiency than SSII, but is bottlenecked by lower template-switching efficiency in protocols that need it, and some of the extra robustness in SSIV and Maxima appear necessary to overcome inhibitors in the newer bead based massive-multiplexing protocols but not solution based. Most of the protocols being published recently have included at least a little bit of their optimization path, which should could save a lot of time and cost if you were thinking of modifications. As a side note, I've wondered why there hasn't been more love for SMARTScribe. It works at least as well as SSII, is actually QC'd with a template-switching based assay, and is dirt cheap compared to other RNaseH- RTs (Full disclosure: I'm a former Clontech employee, but have since made single cell products for other companies and recently left the scRNA-Seq field but still lurk).
cmbetts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2017, 12:16 PM   #5
Junior Member
Location: america

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 9

I've used both. And ClonTech's RTs. I've personally found that Maxima and Primescript both work well at 50C and 42C respectively. Try the Primescript with Betaine and DTT in the mix and see if that works for you.
plyguy69 is offline   Reply With Quote

cdna, maxima single cell, rna, superscript

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO