Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Next-seq starting library concentration for library denaturation Irene Sample Prep / Library Generation 2 10-19-2016 08:22 PM
Low concentration and large size of Trusight One library Merav Sample Prep / Library Generation 15 05-09-2016 10:02 AM
low DNA conc after amplification -DNA library prep dummyseq Illumina/Solexa 2 01-25-2013 12:26 PM
NaOH/clustering jlm Illumina/Solexa 3 05-23-2012 07:28 AM
library reagent units and conc niceday Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 02-15-2011 06:45 AM

Thread Tools
Old 09-13-2018, 10:06 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Denmark

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2
Post NaOH denaturation with large volumen of low conc library

I am doing targeted sequencing using a <15000 kb panel, and because I consequently get rather low library conc (and try to limit the no of PCR cycles) I often use a somewhat large volumen of my library pools for the NAOH denaturation step prior flow cell loading (Nextseq 500 mid).
For rutine library pools the protocol says:
1. Dilute library pool to 2 nM in a 0.1% Tween buffer
2. Denature 5 uL hereof with 5 uL 0.2 M NaOH, neutralize with 5 uL 0.2 M Tris-HCl
3. Do this for all pools to be loaded.
4. Add to each pool HT1 loading buffer to a total volumen (for all pools) of 1 mL.
5. Load onto flowcell.

For the 15k panel:
1. Skip step 1 since the conc is below 2 nM
2. Denature 10 - 50 uL (depending on the conc of the library pool) in 0.2 M NaOH, neutralize with same amount of 0,2 M NaCl.
3-5. Same.

The thing is that it seems as if the cluster generation some times is very inefficient (measured as cluster density per library copies). I suspect that it could have something to do with the larger ratio of (Library+NaOH+Hcl) / HT1 compared to the rutine protocol. In a rutine setup for 4 library pools it would be 4 pools * 5 uL* 3 = 60 uL Library+NaOH+Hcl and 940 uL HT1. The same numbers for 4 40 uL pools in the alternative protocol is 4*40*3 = 360 uL and 640 uL HT1 buffer.

Some concerns could be :
1. A higher amount of Na Cl .
2. Lower molarity of the HT1 constituents
3. Insuffucient buffer capacity with less HT1 (pH is not optimal).

Does anyone have experience with low conc / high vol setup ?


Last edited by madras; 09-13-2018 at 10:09 AM.
madras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2018, 04:18 AM   #2
Location: Boston

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 24

Try to search older threads. There are a few talking about using low concentration library.
gabrieltw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2018, 06:14 AM   #3
Junior Member
Location: Denmark

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2

Yeah thanks.
I did look through these, e.g. this one. They seem to be somewhat old. My main concern I think is whether HT1 buffer need to be almost "undiluted" - i.e. constitute the majority of the volumen loaded.
madras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2018, 05:21 AM   #4
Junior Member
Location: Sweden

Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2


I recently ran Nextseq, I have observed that the cluster density and the total number of reads was very low when compare to the other experiments. Qscore was 97%, Cluster passing filter was above 95% but cluster density K/mm2 was around 94 and the total number of reads for 4 lanes was around 200 million reads. For my previous experiments usually I will get above 180 K/mm2 and around 400 to 500 million reads. I have just followed the same as previous experiments, but not sure where went wrong to get low cluster density and reads.

I have denatured the sample with 0.2 N NaOH, is it the sample that is behaving or something wrong with the preparation?

I used 4nM sample conc with 1.8 loading concentration.

Kodavali is offline   Reply With Quote

denaturation, nextseq500

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO