Ditto, it is a pain also for us, would be very nice to have it fixed in GATK. They say in http://getsatisfaction.com/gsa/topic...ent_i_d_events that this is a buggy CIGAR but I doubt - there is nothing to say adjacent I/Ds are forbidden. New aligners that are not based on Smith-Waterman or BW can generate valid alignments with CIGARs like this. Should we ask them again on the GATK forum to have an other look?
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Stampy->GATK
Originally posted by ameynert View PostYes, I was using Stampy 0.1.12 to generate the alignments. The problem is fixed in Stampy 0.1.13 as far as I can tell. I've generally been pretty happy with the indels generated from a Stampy > realign > score recal > unifiedgenotyper pipeline.
Comment
-
Exact same problem
I'm using version 13 of Stampy, but have exactly the same problem when trying to call indels with -glm INDEL, namely:
"SAM/BAM file SAMFileReader{/Volumes/Data/sherlock/Pseudomonas/All_PAO1_strains.realigned.recal.bam} is malformed: Adjacent I/D events in read MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0"
The reads in question have the following alignments:
MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0 83 NC_002516.2 33359 5 4M4D2M11I19M = 33371 -16 TGAACCGCTCTTCTGATCTCGGCGGTGTATTCGCCG =8?8=C7HAF?AF<;2=G@G:CH:3?/,4:8A1;3: RG:Z:GSRG000011 NM:i:1 MQ:i:5 OQ:Z:=7?5A@4A@BA@B:@@7D@D@BA@BB338:86868B PQ:i:431 UQ:i:23 XQ:i:228
MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0 163 NC_002516.2 33371 5 18M11I6D7M = 33359 16 CGGCGGTGTATTCGCCGAGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTG @FGEFIBKB?DBHJGHKCID=FJJ9FB9K0KCIKCB RG:Z:GSRG000011 NM:i:1 SM:i:0 MQ:i:5 OQ:Z:IHIGFGIIIDGGGEEIIBDI@DGG8G?DG2GDGGGD PQ:i:431 UQ:i:42 XQ:i:204
The file worked fine for calling SNPs. Does anyone know a fix or workaround? Can one simply:
samtools view All_PAO1_strains.realigned.recal.bam | grep -v "MAGNUM:2:65:15227:4196#0" > fixed.sam
add in the header, index and rerun? I guess I'll try.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NGSfan View PostHi Gavin,
try adding -rf BadCigar and see what happens.
Let me know if it works for you
Many thanks for the help.
Comment
-
Same problem--running identical pipelines on some exome data with several aligners and only got this error with the Stampy (v14) BAMs (specifically for -INDEL or -BOTH, but not with -SNPS). Will try the above--ThanksLast edited by dustinlong; 01-21-2012, 10:15 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dustinlong View PostSame problem--running identical pipelines on some exome data with several aligners and only got this error with the Stampy (v14) BAMs (specifically for -INDEL or -BOTH, but not with -SNPS). Will try the above--Thanks
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...-
Channel: Articles
03-22-2024, 06:39 AM -
-
by seqadmin
The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.
Avian Conservation
Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...-
Channel: Articles
03-08-2024, 10:41 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 06:37 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
|
0 responses
9 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 06:07 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
|
0 responses
51 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
|
0 responses
67 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
|
Comment