I was told today by our collaborators that they have found that directly sequencing the mRNA gives them better results then converting to cDNA when they do RNA-seq. Has anyone else found this to be true? Every paper that I have read on RNA-seq converts the mRNA to cDNA, was just curious if anyone else had tried directly sequencing the mRNA.
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Just a point of clairification: unless your collaborators have early access to some leading edge tech or, more likely, have access to one of the handful of Helicos sequencers, my guess is that they are not "directly sequencing mRNA". Even the proof of principle RNAseq paper from the Broad was about directly converting RNA to cDNA in the flowcell of and Illumina did not "directly" sequence that RNA, but rather the cDNA created in the flowcell.
To "directly" sequence RNA you would need an enzyme that could use RNA as a template (probably reverse transcriptase). In principle this is possible (some of the earliest sequencing templates were RNA).
It is possible that your collaborators have removed one of the intervening layers of conversion/amplification and are calling that "direct" sequencing of the RNA. Here are the layers as I would define them:
(A)Cellular RNA in situ
--break cells isolate RNA
(B)Total RNA
--ribo-deplete or mRNA purify
(C)mRNA
--cDNA conversion
(D)cDNA
--library construction: end polish, adapter ligate
(E)amplicon library (zero amp)
--enrichment PCR
(F)final library
--emulsion PCR/bridge PCR
(G)templated beads/clusters
By this scheme all commonly used next gen sequencers use layer "G" templates. The exceptions being 3rd gen PAC bio and Helicos instruments. Helicos does apparently have a direct RNA sequencing methodology. A Helicos instrument would operate at layer "B".
How many Helicos instruments are in the field? A dozen?
Anyway, I just wanted to add some context...
--
Phillip
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
-
by seqadmin
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...-
Channel: Articles
03-22-2024, 06:39 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
30 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
32 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
53 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment