Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Empty FPKM estimates after cuffcompare

    I ran cufflinks on several BAM files and get tracking.gtf files looking like (truncated lines):

    Code:
    Chr1    Cufflinks   transcript  22746   23685   1000    +   .   gene_id "CUFF.8"; transcript_id "CUFF.8.1"; FPKM "32.3697173163"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "28.299584"; conf_hi "36.439851"; cov "52.362831";
    Chr1    Cufflinks   exon    22746   23020   1000    +   .   gene_id "CUFF.8"; transcript_id "CUFF.8.1"; exon_number "1"; FPKM "32.3697173163"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "28.299584"; conf_hi "36.439851"; cov "$
    Chr1    Cufflinks   exon    23096   23685   1000    +   .   gene_id "CUFF.8"; transcript_id "CUFF.8.1"; exon_number "2"; FPKM "32.3697173163"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "28.299584"; conf_hi "36.439851"; cov "$
    Chr1    Cufflinks   transcript  79944   80186   1000    +   .   gene_id "CUFF.3"; transcript_id "CUFF.3.1"; FPKM "3077.9273423595"; frac "1.000000"; conf_lo "1765.494714"; conf_hi "4390.359971"; cov "2714.84$
    Ch
    and then run cuffcompare to compare with a merged gtf file as
    Code:
    cuffcompare -o myprefix -r merged.gtf transcripts.gtf
    but, the myprefix.tracking only gives me FPKM estimates equal zero for all genes:

    Code:
    TCONS_00000001  XLOC_000001 XLOC_000001|TCONS_00000001  c   q1:CUFF.8|CUFF.8.1|100|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|-
    TCONS_00000002  XLOC_000002 XLOC_000002|TCONS_00000002  =   q1:CUFF.11|CUFF.11.1|100|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|-
    TCONS_00000003  XLOC_000003 XLOC_000003|TCONS_00000003  =   q1:CUFF.2|CUFF.2.1|100|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|-
    TCONS_00000004  XLOC_000004 XLOC_000004|TCONS_00000004  =   q1:CUFF.4|CUFF.4.1|100|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|-
    TCONS_00000005  XLOC_000005 XLOC_000005|TCONS_00000006  c   q1:CUFF.16|CUFF.16.1|100|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|0.000000|-
    T
    note that CUFF.8 in the transcripts.gtf has a non-zero FPKM estimate but this does not propagate to the myprefix.tracking file.

    Any ideas why? Grateful for answers.

  • #2
    Have you tried running it with Cufflinks-1.1.0? (released last week)

    I noticed a similar problem with the .tmap files generated by cuffcompare in release 1.0.3, however that problem seems to have been corrected in the most recent release.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the tip, I tried Cufflinks-1.1.0 and indeed this solves the problem!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin


        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
        Today, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      37 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      41 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X