SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Negative controls and index hopping Illumina HiSeq - Metagenomics robertsr Illumina/Solexa 0 10-08-2019 05:16 PM
SureSelect XT HS index hopping torbean Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 05-09-2018 06:29 AM
Prevention of index hopping in Illumina tech GenoMax Illumina/Solexa 1 04-05-2018 10:43 AM
Index hopping Hiseq4000 and single cell Bidfudge Illumina/Solexa 3 11-29-2017 04:59 AM
ChIP-seq with 2 negative controls hersh Bioinformatics 1 01-24-2010 11:11 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-08-2019, 08:03 PM   #1
robertsr
Junior Member
 
Location: Canada

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 2
Unhappy Negative controls and index hopping Illumina HiSeq - Metagenomics

Hi there,

We consistently conduct multiplexed shotgun metagenomic sequencing (human stool samples) using an Illumina PCR-free protocol. We were previously sequencing on the HiSeq 2500 but have recently begun sequencing on the HiSeq X.

We usually multiplex 48 samples per pool/lane with one negative control per pool (negative control starting from extraction right through to sequencing). From this we usually obtain 4-8 million reads per sample. Previously on the HiSeq 2500 we obtained 10-70,000 reads in the negative controls. Since switching to the HiSeq X, we have obtained up to 600,000 reads in our negative controls.

We do not believe that this is true contamination in the negative controls as they record no DNA concentration following DNA extraction (picogreen), no tapestation signal and negligible qPCR values using the KAPA library quantification kit following library preparation (~2pM vs 10nM for actual samples). Therefore, prior to sequencing, there does not seem to be any relevant quantity of DNA/library in the negative controls.

We therefore think that this may be a sequencing/bioinformatic issue. We are aware of potential index hopping (we are using single index adapters but hopefully switching to dual index as a result of this), however we are unsure if index hopping could contribute to this number of reads in a negative control?

Any insight into this issue would be very much appreciated as we are unsure what to do with our sequencing results with so many reads in our 'negative' controls!

Thanks!
robertsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2019, 09:29 AM   #2
SNPsaurus
Registered Vendor
 
Location: Eugene, OR

Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 501
Default

Index hopping can produce that result. Are you using the index hopping blocking kit from Illumina? But either way, dual uniques are the way to go.
__________________
Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com
SNPsaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2019, 04:25 AM   #3
kmcarr
Senior Member
 
Location: USA, Midwest

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNPsaurus View Post
Index hopping can produce that result. Are you using the index hopping blocking kit from Illumina? But either way, dual uniques are the way to go.
... (removed pointless follow up)
kmcarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
index hopping, metagenomics, negative control

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO