SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BWA-MEM and X0/X1/etc flags mturchin20 Bioinformatics 5 07-15-2015 06:54 AM
Odd bwa-mem alignment myronpeto Bioinformatics 16 03-12-2015 11:40 AM
bwa mem segfault; bwa bwasw breaks MarkDuplicates ElenaN Bioinformatics 2 06-30-2013 10:23 PM
BWA sam and Samtools sam->bam conversion problem maasha Bioinformatics 6 06-05-2013 07:39 AM
bwa mem -R option dakin Bioinformatics 2 05-02-2013 07:42 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-19-2013, 11:23 AM   #1
mozack
Junior Member
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 8
Default SAM spec / BWA-MEM

Hello,

The release notes for bwa-mem 0.7.5 reference an upcoming SAM spec v1.5. Does anyone know if a preview of the coming spec changes is available publicly?


"Changed the way a chimeric alignment is reported (conforming to the upcoming
SAM spec v1.5). With 0.7.5, if the read has a chimeric alignment, the paired
or the top hit uses soft clipping and is marked with neither 0x800 nor 0x100
bits. All the other hits part of the chimeric alignment will use hard
clipping and be marked with 0x800 if option "-M" is not in use, or marked
with 0x100 otherwise."


Thanks!
mozack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 12:16 PM   #2
BAMseek
Senior Member
 
Location: St. Louis, MO, USA

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 124
Default

I found the latex for it:

https://github.com/samtools/sam-spec...ster/SAMv1.tex

Looks like you'll have to convert latex to pdf if you want to make it more readable.

Justin
BAMseek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO