Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fasta name changes

    I have a word file with 222 pages worth of fasta genes... that adds up. The phylogenetic program I plan to use doesn't like a long FASTA header all that much, so I have to change it to something less than 10 characters. considering the large number of genes I have in the document, I would like to know a way to change all these names in a quicker manner than just manually changing each and every one. I'm aware that building a program can solve this, but I only have introductory experience in python. Any advice? Thanks!

  • #2
    First of all, you should not have sequence data in a word file. That is just asking for trouble. Second, you can easily edit the fasta headers in the *nix command line, given that your sequences are in a plain text file. So put your seqs into a proper text file and then post example headers and what you want them to look like..
    savetherhino.org

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by aniben View Post
      I have a word file with 222 pages worth of fasta genes...
      Do you mean MS Word document? If so, save it as text file. When asked, use "LF only" as newline character. As an aside, don't keep sequence or any other sort of data in Word documents, you are going to make your bioinformatic life really complicated with that!

      The phylogenetic program I plan to use doesn't like a long FASTA header all that much, so I have to change it to something less than 10 characters.
      Are you sure only 10 characters are allowed? That sounds a bit weird... Anyway, if you really want to cut sequence names short you could use this crude way:

      Code:
      awk '{if($0 ~ /^>/){x= substr($0, 1, 10); print x} else {print $0}}' seq.fa.txt > shortnames.fa
      Replace 10 with the desired number of chars to keep, seq.fa.txt is the text file saved as above.

      Comment


      • #4
        With BBTools:

        bbrename.sh in=old.fasta out=new.fasta

        That will rename the reads as 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 222.

        You can also give a custom prefix if you want. The input has to be text format, not .doc.

        Comment


        • #5
          Ok, thanks. Making it to a text file won't be all that much of a problem.

          Comment


          • #6
            As you make these changes keep in mind that those 10 characters have to be unique (and logical enough for you to understand the trees afterwards) otherwise the phylogenetic program may not like it.

            How many sequences do you have in that file? Are they all unique? It may be easier to name them 1,2,3 .. based on Brian's suggestion and then convert back to real names once you complete the analysis (photoshop?)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by dariober View Post
              Are you sure only 10 characters are allowed?
              Some established phylogenetic programs (phylip) do have this requirement.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • seqadmin
                Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
                by seqadmin




                The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
                04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
              • seqadmin
                Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
                by seqadmin


                Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
                04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
              0 responses
              60 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
              0 responses
              59 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Working...
              X