![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
paired-end vs. mate-pair | lre1234 | Bioinformatics | 8 | 04-05-2013 06:25 AM |
Samtools Flag to identify outward facing (mate-pair not paired end) reads | lesander | Bioinformatics | 5 | 10-28-2011 02:24 PM |
Are the mate-pair reads always shadowed by their friends the paired-end (picture) | seb567 | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 07-15-2011 10:49 AM |
Help me!!!!! low % of properly paired reads!!! | Trudy | Bioinformatics | 1 | 05-25-2011 12:26 AM |
How to check read are properly paired from SAM file? | jlfmssm | Bioinformatics | 5 | 06-25-2010 11:23 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: UK Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Dear all,
I have recently got some mate-pair data which has to be assembled denovo. Are there any ways through which we can determine if the reads are properly oriented and are at a distance expected before actually doing the denovo assembly. Thanks for any ideas/suggestions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Uppsala, Sweden Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 23
|
![]()
I suppose you don't have a close relative which you could map your reads on?
Do you have some paired end data? We assembled all paired end data first, and then mapped all mate pairs onto the paired-end denovo assembly. If the pair mapped FR with ins ~400bp, we discarded it as paired end contamination. Of course not all pairs will have both reads in the same contig, but you can at least get a proportion of "bad" pairs when comparing to the set mapping correctly (RF, with correct insert size). I've also heard people done the same, but mapping to the mitochondrial genome (if you happen to have that). Good luck! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
Location: UK Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|