![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNA-Seq: shortran: A pipeline for small RNA-seq data analysis. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 08-24-2012 03:00 AM |
Total small rna quantity and comparison of small rna-seq with long rna-seq | doublehelix82 | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-09-2012 11:09 AM |
small RNA seq analysis | gfmgfm | Bioinformatics | 0 | 02-01-2011 01:05 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Auburn, AL Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Instead of using all the transcripts as reference for the RNA-seq analysis, can I use a small subset which I am interested? I compared the results, of course, the expression values from the small subset is higher than that from the whole set. What I'm concerned is that, Does it cause any bias to the expression values?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Devon Ryan
Location: Freiburg, Germany Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,480
|
![]()
This will depend upon how you do your mapping and then the expression quantitation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
Location: Auburn, AL Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 8
|
![]() Quote:
Set parameters is as below Minimum length fraction: 0.9 Minimum similarity fraction: 0.8 Maximum number of hits for a read: 10 What is the right way to do the mapping and quantitation for a small subset reference? I really appreciate if you can provide a reference for this. Thank you very much! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
not just another member
Location: Belgium Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 264
|
![]()
I don't think it's a good idea. It's always better to map to all the transcript because your data is coming from total RNA ( or poly-A RNA). It can happen that when you map to your subset, some reads maybe map in a better way to transcript that are not in your subset..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Junior Member
Location: Auburn, AL Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 8
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gene expression, rna-seq |
Thread Tools | |
|
|