![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quantifying allele fraction of small to medium deletions in amplication sequencing | brentonmar | Bioinformatics | 1 | 08-08-2013 06:56 AM |
how to compute Minor Allele Frequency for a variant call? | BhariD | Bioinformatics | 0 | 05-07-2013 11:50 AM |
how does varscan somatic compute variant allele frequency? | genomicist | Bioinformatics | 0 | 06-11-2012 04:21 AM |
Variant calls with a low fraction of alt reads | Jeremy37 | Bioinformatics | 9 | 04-17-2012 07:18 PM |
A SNP discovery method to assess variant allele probability from NGS | NGSfan | Literature Watch | 0 | 01-11-2010 04:48 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: china Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
|
![]()
hi:
What are "variant allele fraction" when talking about somatic mutations? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Location: San Francisco, CA Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 91
|
![]() Quote:
For instance, if all cells contains the same heterogeneous mutation (e.g., 100% tumor cell purity if you're looking at tumor cells), the variant allele fraction would be 50% (half-half from each chromosome). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Location: china Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: San Francisco, CA Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 91
|
![]()
This is an example of an output in my somatic calling pipeline:
Code:
Variant Annotation Gene Exon Codon Chr Position Variant N(A) N(C) N(G) N(T) T(A) T(C) T(G) T(T) QSS Frequency nonsynonymous SNV KRAS exon2 G12A chr12 25398284 G35C 0 83 0 0 1 37 12 0 57 0.24 N(A), N(C), N(G), and N(T) stand for the number of calls for A, C, G, and T in the normal sample. T(A), T(C), T(G), and T(T) stand for the number of calls for A, C, G, and T in the tumor sample. So for the normal sample, there are 83 sequences where the base is called C, and 0 for everything else. So it's pretty clear that in the reference and the normal sample, the base is C. However, in the tumor sample, there are 37 calls for C (reference) and 12 calls for G (variant), so the variant frequency is 12/(12+37) = 0.245. Notice the variant is labeled G35C. That's because the coding strand is the minus strand, where the DNA reads use the plus strand. Anyway, how do you interpret 24.5%? Well, if I assume that 1) the KRAS mutation is present in all tumor cells (just use this assumption as an example), and 2) KRAS mutation is a heterozygous mutation, then The tumor sample must contain 1/2 non-tumor cells, because those cells give me half of the reference reads. Out of the remaining 1/2 are tumor cells, half of those chromosomes give me reference reads, and the other 1/2 chromosomes give me mutant reads. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: china Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
|
![]()
Awesome, thanks!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Location: Milan Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 40
|
![]()
@lethalfang
`Would you like to share the pipeline for finding somatic mutations. I have 2 samples, one low and one high grade tumor and its normal. I want to detect the point somatic mutations. I have already employed GATK, VarScan and Mutect, but I have some descrepancy when am looking at my Low grade tumor since it is 50% pure. So I would like to try something more and have a read statistics like you have shown to validate the hits. If its ok for you |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Location: San Francisco, CA Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 91
|
![]() Quote:
I just had a script to get those information out of the Strelka output vcf file. I had all those Strelka out directories in a single location, and ran this script to "summarize" all mutation calls from all the samples: http://kimlab.surgery.ucsf.edu/media...a_findings.txt It also calls annovar, which has a hard-coded path within the script. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Location: Nebraska Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Just wondering: The T(A) isn't counted because the frequency is just for T(G) variants?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Location: Milan Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 40
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Location: San Francisco, CA Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 91
|
![]() Quote:
So the tumor's variant allele frequency does not care what's in the normal tissue, and vice versa. That way, you can monitor the change in variant allele frequency between the tumor and the normal. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Location: Milan Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 40
|
![]()
Thank you very much for the reply. That makes sense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|