![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why edgeR ouput some p values larger than 1 | idyll_ty | RNA Sequencing | 1 | 02-01-2013 04:14 PM |
Separate bam file | m_elena_bioinfo | Bioinformatics | 7 | 07-31-2012 06:12 PM |
Separate forward and reverse coverage in Artemis | nivea | Bioinformatics | 4 | 12-12-2011 04:20 AM |
How to separate individual sample variants from multiple samples | meher | Bioinformatics | 0 | 06-30-2011 01:11 PM |
bwa aln fred score offset | offsetoff | Bioinformatics | 1 | 06-14-2011 03:14 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: United States Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi,
Thanks in advance for helping. I'm trying to use edgeR on some RNA-Seq data I have to test for differential expression. However, I would like to use a separate normalization value for each tag as opposed to the effective library size calculated by edgeR that's used across the entire sample. Essentially, I want to be able to supply "offset" values as used in glm models per tag as opposed to per sample. Any idea if edgeR has this flexibility or maybe DESeq? Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Melbourne, Australia Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 91
|
![]()
edgeR accepts a matrix value for 'offset', of the same dimensions as the counts. This allows you to specify a separate and possibly different normalization value for every tag in each library.
Best wishes Gordon PS. I read and answer questions on the Bioconductor list regularly, but only occasionally on seqanswers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
deseq, edger, library size |
Thread Tools | |
|
|