![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ampure versus Ampure XP | seqgirl123 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 49 | 03-19-2015 04:02 AM |
Good Beads / Best Beads | paolo.kunder | SOLiD | 2 | 03-27-2013 03:12 PM |
AMPure, amplicons and GS Jr enrichment beads | suefo | 454 Pyrosequencing | 17 | 02-06-2012 04:24 AM |
TruSeq RNA initial concentration and Ampure beads | OnUrMark | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 3 | 09-27-2011 09:37 AM |
SPRI lib prep? | BIG_SNP | Illumina/Solexa | 32 | 03-23-2011 09:42 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: United Kingdom Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Hey guys
Curious as to which system you think is better? I've been trawling this forum regarding size selection using magnetic beads, for use in RADseq (a modified gDNA illumina prep). I'm just a little confused - - can you buy SPRI beads separately from the technology/hardware? I can't find anything on the beckman page for just SPRI beads. Or am I being dumb and the beads rely on the hardware to work, so you have to buy the whole system for automated library prep? - are AMPure XP beads (which I have access to) just as good at size selection as SPRI beads? I'm hearing a lot more about the SPRI system on this forum for size selection, rather than the XP beads. Ideally I would like to size select for fragments 300-500bp, for which I'm aware I'll probably need to do a double selection (one to eradiate fragments >500bp, the other to eradicate fragments <300bp), which is fine. Also, if anyone knows a good method to calculate the bead ![]() Cheers Tali |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Sweden Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 324
|
![]()
Ampure XP beads are SPRI beads. It is easy to test on a ladder, or look at the metagenomics paper in PloS one for the ratios.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: United Kingdom Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Ahh ok, I hadn't realised that! I'll try out a couple of ratios (based on that paper, thanks for that reference) on a ladder.
Thanks a lot |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Location: new haven Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Location: new haven Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered Vendor
Location: UK Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Hi Tali,
You are correct that the website is a little confusing! Our SPRI products are on the Beckman Coulter Genomics website. Here is a link directly through to the AMPure XP page. https://www.beckmancoulter.com/wsrpo...tion/index.htm If you have any further questions or queries then do not hesitate to get in touch. Best wishes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Location: new haven Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hi,
Thank you! I have the SPRI bead. I will use it to select PCR product of 300-500bp size. I use the recommend protocal but the cut-off is not clear. On the website I can not find any information. Can you help me? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Junior Member
Location: china Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
|
![]()
hi, your link is wrong, there's no product information.
I'm just wondering if there is a way to search in your company website! Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Vendor
Location: UK Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Dear LucyYang1991,
That is strange, I just clicked the link and it took me directly to the AMPureXP page. If it is your first time to the website, you may need to select your region and it should then take you to the product page. You could try this link to our Life Sciences page. https://www.beckmancoulter.com/wsrpo...very/index.htm There is a small magnifying glass in the top right. Click on that to bring up the search bar. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Vendor
Location: UK Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Apologies, I was not notified that you had responded to my link. I realise this is now a very late reply but the cut off is around 120-150bp when using the standard x1.8 ratio.
It is not a sharp cutoff. You will still get some products smaller than the cutoff but with significantly reduced amounts. Below 100bp or so all the fragments will be removed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Junior Member
Location: china Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5
|
![]()
OK, thanks a lot, this is the first time to the website. Maybe that's the problem here.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Junior Member
Location: liverpool Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
|
![]() Quote:
i am testing the ampure beads to see is it working or not on a ladder DNA but i got band in 100 pb and i did not understand it can you see my attached image! how do we know if the Ampure beads working or not ? thank you very much. comparing beads 11.7.17.jpg |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Location: Honolulu, HI Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 40
|
![]() Quote:
Also, from what I understand, it's better to test the beads on enzyme-digested lambda-DNA (to generate a known fragment size profile) rather than on pre-packaged DNA ladder. Something about an ingredient inhibiting binding/elution (I'm fuzzy on the details). This may or may not be true, however, so take it with a grain of salt. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Junior Member
Location: liverpool Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
|
![]() Quote:
Testing beads. I use 2 microliter of ladder DNA diluted with 18 microliter of dearer and I add 36 microliter of beads then I complete the steps that in the attached file. Many thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Location: Honolulu, HI Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 40
|
![]()
I see! Well, I'd recommend using a ratio slightly less than 1.8x. I'd lower that to 1.5x or so and see if it makes a difference (30 uL AmpureXP to 20 uL ladder dilution).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Junior Member
Location: liverpool Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
|
![]() Quote:
Many thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Location: Honolulu, HI Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 40
|
![]() Quote:
So on the gel you would run: 1) PCR Product w/o cleanup 2) PCR Product w/ cleanup at 1.8x 3) PCR Product w/ cleanup at 1.5x ...and see if there's a difference. It's a bit of extra work, but it's a small price to pay for peace of mind. This approach may also be better than testing on a ladder, since you'll be working with the PCR products directly (rather than with a ladder which may or may not have an inhibitory effect on the SPRI beads). ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Junior Member
Location: liverpool Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 6
|
![]() Quote:
I am thinking about PCR cycling for the first round is 18 cycle and in the second round is25cycle so is it ok to increase the cycle in the first round to 35 cycle what do you suggest? Many thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Location: Honolulu, HI Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 40
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,238
|
![]()
It depends on your experiment and input. It is not clear if you are preparing 16S region specific library for sequencing on Illumina systems or whole 16S for long read sequencing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|