![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ChIP-Seq: Single-tube linear DNA amplification (LinDA) for robust ChIP-seq. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 19 | 02-29-2016 08:08 PM |
Starting concentration of sample/control in ChIP Seq | mnandita | Epigenetics | 2 | 12-15-2011 10:02 AM |
TruSeq DNA adapters in RNA-seq prep... concentration? | ScottC | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 4 | 09-10-2011 03:38 AM |
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-Seq Using High-Throughput DNA Sequencing for Genome-Wide Identificatio | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 10-16-2010 03:00 AM |
Anyone use low concentration for ChIP-seq prep? | Audry888 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 4 | 05-28-2010 12:37 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: us Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
|
![]()
Hi everyone,
I am doing a ChIP-seq using Illumina platform. After IP, I have less than 10 ng of DNA, while I have at least 10-fold excess in Input. My question is whether it is important to use same amount of Input and ChIP DNA before library preparation. The reason I am worried about this is 2-fold a) If using different IP and input DNA before library prep, how else is the data normalized? b) If starting with different amounts of DNA in the final PCR amplification step, there could be a differential amplification of some regions, skewing the data. What are your thoughts. Thanks for all inputs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6
|
![]()
Yes, I completely agree with you. When I prepare my ChIP-Seq libraries, the input and IP concentrations are the same to reduce any biases, especially during the amplification stage.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|