fasta35 VS fasta36

Antony03 · 08-07-2014, 04:03 PM

Hello,

I need to use, for a specific job, fasta35 and not fasta36. However, the result is clearly not the same between both.

fasta35 gives only 1 alignment: http://pastebin.com/f4NdYJCt

while fasta36 gives 3 alignments: http://pastebin.com/ADeKJ4GC

What I'm doing wrong with fasta35? It is probably not normal that it misses almost 2 perfect alignments on 3.

Thank you!

maubp · 08-08-2014, 01:05 AM

This is a new feature in fasta36

P.S. This question is a duplicate of a BioPerl mailing list thread where Chris gave a more detailed answer: http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/...st/088909.html

08-07-2014, 04:03 PM	#1
Antony03 Member Location: Canada, Quebec Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 53	fasta35 VS fasta36 Hello, I need to use, for a specific job, fasta35 and not fasta36. However, the result is clearly not the same between both. fasta35 gives only 1 alignment: http://pastebin.com/f4NdYJCt while fasta36 gives 3 alignments: http://pastebin.com/ADeKJ4GC What I'm doing wrong with fasta35? It is probably not normal that it misses almost 2 perfect alignments on 3. Thank you!

08-08-2014, 01:05 AM	#2
maubp Peter (Biopython etc) Location: Dundee, Scotland, UK Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,543	This is a new feature in fasta36 P.S. This question is a duplicate of a BioPerl mailing list thread where Chris gave a more detailed answer: http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/...st/088909.html Last edited by maubp; 08-08-2014 at 01:07 AM. Reason: Added link