![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Illumina reads failing to map to bacterial genome with Tophat | C9r1y | Bioinformatics | 2 | 12-07-2015 07:51 AM |
does tophat rescue PE reads that do not map by aligning a single end of the PE? | zorph | Bioinformatics | 0 | 09-09-2011 03:14 PM |
Tophat - Left Kept Reads | jkozubek | Bioinformatics | 2 | 07-27-2011 06:40 AM |
Reads map in Tophat, but Cufflinks doesn't find transcripts | janec | Bioinformatics | 0 | 07-07-2011 02:42 AM |
Best tool to map 454 reads onto sanger reads? | dan | Bioinformatics | 3 | 07-27-2009 09:51 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Europe Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hi!
I am trying to map RNA Seq (chick) with Tophat2 and I am getting low overall mapping rates (~30%). In the align_summary.txt file generated by Tophat2 - it appears that my right reads are mapping at over 90% whereas the left reads are mapping at 30%. This is happening to all but one sample. Has anyone ever encountered this or know how to resolve this? This is the command I used: tophat -p 8 -G gene_model.gtf -o Sample1 genome4 Sample1_1.fastq.gz Sample1_2.fastq.gz > Sample1.log 2>&1 & Thanks in advance ![]() Adi |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Devon Ryan
Location: Freiburg, Germany Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,480
|
![]()
Did you run fastQC (or any other QC software) on these reads?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Europe Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Yes I ran FastQC. The Per base sequence quality is in the green zone for all of them. In some the right reads are slightly lower than the left, but not much.
The only other thing I notice with FastQC is that 'Sequence Duplication Levels' are very high (>=55.7%) . I don't know whether this could influence mapping though. Thanks. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
rnaseq, tophat |
Thread Tools | |
|
|