Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Question about how to interpret DEXSeq data with a multi-factor experimental design

    I have successfully run DEXSeq (version 1.16.7) in R version 3.2.3. I believe the analysis ran smoothly without any problems but I am having trouble interpreting the results.

    I have a multi-factor experimental design:
    Day 1/Low CO2
    Day 1/High CO2
    Day 7/Low CO2
    Day 7/High CO2

    I checked for the effect of CO2 with the following formulas:
    ~ sample + exon
    vs.
    ~ sample + exon + CO2:exon
    This resulted in 134149 insignificant hits and 3 significant hits

    I then checked for the effect of CO2 when accounting for Day with the following:
    reduced model = ~ sample + exon + Day:exon
    full model = ~ sample + exon + Day:exon + condition:exon
    This resulted in the same results as above

    I then did 4 separate tests subsetting the data:
    Effect of Day in only low CO2 data: 4,821 significant hits
    Effect of Day in only high CO2 data: 4,258 significant hits
    Effect of CO2 only in Day 1: no significant hits
    Effect of CO2 only in Day 7: no significant hits

    The large effect of Day is expected because we were sequencing early embryos that were developing very quickly. However, you can see the number of significant exons is not the same in the two tests for the effect of Day. Furthermore, when I compare the lists of the 4,821 significant hits to the list of the 4,258 significant hits, I find a lot of hits unique to each test.

    This leads me to believe there might be an interaction between CO2 and Day but I cannot figure out how to test for it. My question is: How do I test for the interacting effect between two factors in DEXSeq?

    Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
25 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X