Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems with QC results of Illumina Body Map 2.0 hajime Illumina/Solexa 4 08-14-2011 05:45 PM
RNA-Seq: Comparative Analysis of RNA-Seq Alignment Algorithms and the RNA-Seq Unified Newsbot! Literature Watch 3 07-31-2011 07:08 PM
RNA-seq library prep problems katussa10 Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 01-13-2011 08:56 AM
RNA-Seq: From RNA-seq reads to differential expression results. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 12-24-2010 02:13 AM
Small RNA Analysis Tool problems nedoluzhko Bioinformatics 0 10-04-2010 04:39 AM

Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2011, 08:38 PM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Montreal, Canada

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4
Default Problems with RNA-seq analysis results

Hi everyone,

This is my first post here, be sure to let me know if I break a rule of conduct or anything. Tricks & Tips are appreciated.

The situation:
I'm currently trying to analyze RNA-seq data from Illumina Body Map 2.0. I've built a pipeline that seems reasonable and used it to asses quality, trim, map, analyze RNA-seq data with the standard tools. The pipeline is for 100bp single end reads.

The pipeline:
Quality (fastx_tools for trimming and filtering, FastQC for reporting)
fastq_quality_filter -Q33 -q 20 -p 80 <FASTQC_FILE>
fastq_quality_trimmer -Q33 -t 20 -l 50 <FILTER_OUT>
fastqc <TRIM_OUT>

tophat --solexa-quals <UCSC hg19 REF> <TRIM_OUT>

cufflinks <TOPHAT_OUT>
cuffcompare -r <UCSC hg19 ANNOTATION> -R <CUFFLINKS_OUT>

The problems
The output of cuffcompare (cuffcmp.tacking) identifies:
13586 [23.32%] novel (class code j)
6127 [10.51%] intronic (class code i)
19145 [32.86%] contained (class code c)

In this sample, novel+intronic > contained. I'm highly dubious of the trustfulness of those results since one would not expect such high number of non previously reported transcripts. If anyone could point out a flaw in the pipeline or my interpretation of the obtained results I would greatly appreciate it. Do tell if I need to give more details on any part.

Best regards,


Last edited by spapillon; 11-29-2011 at 08:48 PM.
spapillon is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO