![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Galaxy Architecture Documentation for Developers | oren | Bioinformatics | 2 | 09-20-2011 11:02 AM |
ABySS input | Seta | General | 22 | 06-09-2011 08:29 AM |
retrieving reads from SRA - lack of documentation | NGSfan | General | 1 | 06-22-2010 07:09 AM |
Solexa Pipeline documentation, or similar? | jwaage | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 09-15-2009 07:04 AM |
About documentation of corona_lite | ribomics | SOLiD | 4 | 11-15-2008 06:19 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5
|
![]()
Hello,
I am a new user of ABySS. I have 50 Million Solexa 100bp paired-end transcriptome reads that I am intending to assemble de novo. Velvet could not handle my dataset, but my first run with ABySS worked. However, I have a hard time understanding the output. I have 4 questions: 1) I could not find any documentation on the output files created. Can someone maybe direct me to a page where the various files are explained? 2) I also do not quite understand if ABySS considers the paired end reads for the alignment or not. Does someone know? I have run the "pe" mode. 3) What is the number of mismatches allowed in a read to still be assembled to a contig? 4) below I pasted a few contigs from the outfile that Abyss has created (i.e. xxx_contigs.fa) >29036 60 1326 GGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGTCTG >29037 61 114 CGGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGGTTG >29038 62 268 TCGGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGTGTG >29039 60 1139 GGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGGCTG >29040 61 51 CGGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGGCCG >29041 60 13 GGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGGCTT >29042 61 183 CGGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGGGTG >29043 61 44 CGGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGTCCG >29044 61 70 CGGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGTTTG >29045 69 20 GGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGGCTCATAAATGCA >29046 69 34 GGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGTCTCATAAATGCA >29047 69 20 GGCTCGAGGGTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCTGCCGGGCGGGCCCGGGGTGGGTTTGGTCTTGTAAATGCA It is quite clear that these reads are identical with the exception of a few single base mismatchs. Why are they not merged into a single contig? Thanks so much for your help! Last edited by harrb; 11-23-2010 at 08:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Location: canada Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 15
|
![]() Quote:
hope this paper may helps you.. best |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|