Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RNA-Seq for transposon insertion analysis

    Hello all,
    I am a new student to bioinformatics and CLC genomics so would be grateful for any help given as I'm feeling slightly lost.

    I have been given illumina data (fastq files) consisting of the genome sequences to a bacterial genome, initially to perform single- end RNA-Seq analysis and differential expression analysis.
    My main focus is to find: The number of mutants.
    The number of transposon insertions in total.
    The number of transposon insertions per gene.

    I have three conditions: Starting, first output and second output i.e. 3 groups.
    I have replicate sequencing data for the first output and second output data however I only have one set of data for the starting.

    Using CLC genomics, I have been able to trim my sequences, map them to an annotated genome and perform RNA-Seq analysis.
    (An example to aid simplicity of my explanation. My experiment contains 1 starting library, 3 first output replicates and 3 second output replicates).
    To start my comparison, I did a box plot of the three groups. This revealed that the individual samples all have a similar distributions, especially with respect to their own group although, the locations of the distributions differed. Because of this, I normalized my samples by quantile normalization which indeed made the samples comparable exemplified by a box plot showing each sample as having an equal distribution. Was this the right thing to do? Should I have chosen a different normalization method?

    Next, I performed a statistical test on the proportions of the two groups using the starting library as the reference. I performed an unpaired Baggerley test of the three groups and chose the RPKM as the expression value to be used in the test.
    (see manual here http://www.clcsupport.com/clcgenomic...oportions.html )

    Now what I am unsure of the following things:
    What is the easiest way to identify insertions into the genome through the data without individually checking the read mapped onto each gene?
    What is the correct way to normalize my data?
    Statistically what is the best test to use?
    What values are most important for my test?
    Should I use the fold-change, total gene reads or unique gene reads instead of the RPKM for the expression value to be used in the test?

    Thanks in advance

  • #2
    CLC has a built in variant caller algorithm. You can use it to find indels (http://www.clcbio.com/files/tutorials/Resequencing.pdf)
    You should use RPKM instead of the other metrics you mentiond.

    The answers to your other questions are depends on the experiment conditions.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you for your response.
      What conditions precisely do you mean?


      Originally posted by TiborNagy View Post
      CLC has a built in variant caller algorithm. You can use it to find indels (http://www.clcbio.com/files/tutorials/Resequencing.pdf)
      You should use RPKM instead of the other metrics you mentiond.

      The answers to your other questions are depends on the experiment conditions.

      Comment


      • #4
        We developed a simple strategy, split-end alignment, for mapping transposon insertions (described here).

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
          by seqadmin


          The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
          Yesterday, 07:01 AM
        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        41 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X