![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calculation of % Bead enrichment (454 FLX Titanium) | Christina85 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 5 | 03-22-2012 09:25 AM |
Tech Summary: Roche's 454 GS20 / FLX / Titanium | ECO | 454 Pyrosequencing | 12 | 09-11-2011 08:10 AM |
Problems with 454 GS FLX Titanium medium volume sequencing | BL82 | 454 Pyrosequencing | 3 | 01-21-2011 06:08 AM |
Error rates in 454 FLX/Titanium reads | Marcus | 454 Pyrosequencing | 3 | 12-10-2010 12:11 PM |
Discussion and explanation about Roche's 454 GS20 / FLX / Titanium?! | edge | 454 Pyrosequencing | 1 | 10-06-2009 12:22 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Israel Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Hi,
I know this is an obsolete technology, but I came across some data produced on the 454 instrument (archived in SRA/ENA) which I'd like to use for assembly. According to the meta data, insert sizes are 8kb and 20kb, but I wasn't able to figure out the protocol used to produce the libraries. I gather that this is some variant on what we'd now call mate-pair, but I'm not sure if I can treat the data exactly the same way as data coming from Illumina mate-pair libraries, in terms of read orientation, insert size distribution etc. Had anyone worked with such data, or can direct me to some documentation about it? I failed to find anything in the current Roche docs. Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Location: USA, Midwest Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,155
|
![]() Quote:
Wow, time to fire up the WayBack Machine Mr. Peabody. Yes, 454 "Paired End" technology is similar in design to Illumina Mate Pair tech. A large fragment is circularized with a linker, the circular DNA is fragmented and the piece with the linker is enriched. It is then sequenced and the linker sequence is identified to separate the "forward" and "reverse" reads. I have attached a 454 data processing manual; look at section 4.6 for information about paired end data. Here are some links to previous thread on SeqAnswers discussing 454 paired end reads: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8677 http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12940 This latter thread includes a post with the linker sequences (post #2). There are different linker sequencing depending which generation of the library prep kit was used, FLX or Titanium. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Raleigh, NC Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Is the 454 Paired End technology beginner friendly, so to speak? How difficult is it to get into?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,304
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Location: US Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 360
|
![]()
In the age of long read sequencing (PacBio, Nanopore) and linked reads (10X Genomics), "mate pair" sequencing is as obsolete as 454.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,304
|
![]()
I wouldn't go that far! Cheap (no-agarose-gel) Illumina mate-pair libraries are still legitimate, if trailing-edge, technologies.
454 is *dead*, dead. -- Phillip |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
454, mate pair, pair end |
Thread Tools | |
|
|