![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need feedback on RADseq using enzyme BbvCI | barn88 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 05-24-2017 08:29 AM |
Is there a in silico enzyme digestion script? | sunsnow86 | Bioinformatics | 6 | 07-02-2014 01:33 PM |
RNA cleanup AmpureXP beads | sinnafoch | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 11-06-2013 03:49 PM |
Ampure XP beads cleanup and concentration | seqgirl123 | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 04-24-2013 08:40 AM |
any in silico enzyme digestion program for genome | sunsnow86 | Bioinformatics | 5 | 10-08-2012 07:09 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: the Netherlands Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hi all,
I am working on double digest RAD sequencing, and I have quite a general question. In the ddRAD protocol of Peterson et al. they do a beads cleanup directly after enzyme digestion. However, I also know people who skip this step and only do the beads cleanup after the ligation. I am curious what you guys do in your lab and why? I suppose it is a balance between increasing the concentration of the DNA versus loss of DNA? I would like to make a well-informed decision for my samples ![]() Diede |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Melbourne Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,137
|
![]()
Clean up after digestion is unnecessary. If your adapters disrupts the RE recognition site you just can add ligase, ATP and ligation buffer and continue with ligation. You should choose RE and ligase brand where RE buffer will be compatible with ligation reaction.
If adapters ligation maintains the RE recognition site then RE can be deactivated by heat treatment. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
ddrad, digestion, quaddrad, radseq |
Thread Tools | |
|
|