SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > RNA Sequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apparent duplication levels incongruence between bismark and fastqc with BS-Seq data gcarbajosa Bioinformatics 2 12-13-2011 09:43 AM
library concentrations at various levels (RNA seq) Tefina Sample Prep / Library Generation 7 11-08-2011 10:48 AM
Non-linear model for RNA-Seq (reads and expression levels) tldgID RNA Sequencing 1 08-22-2011 08:06 AM
What's the best approach for a RNA seq project aiming at splicing and mRNA levels Jakob RNA Sequencing 6 03-31-2011 11:56 AM
RNA-Seq: Accurate Estimation of Expression Levels of Homologous Genes in RNA-seq Expe Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 03-10-2011 04:00 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-25-2010, 09:23 PM   #1
shazzle
Junior Member
 
Location: SG

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3
Question Quantifying trascript levels using RNA-seq

Hi guys,

I thought of asking this:

1. Can we get sequencing data of a certain mrna from RNA-seq, say from heart and muscle, and use it to quantify and make conclusion about transcript levels in heart and muscle? Is it conclusive, i mean, wouldnt there be noise to take care of and some statistics to normalise the levels of capture on the mrna?

2. If 1. is possible, can we extend the quantification theory to ChIP-seq ie. measuring TF levels in cancer/non-cancer groups?

Thanks!
shazzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 10:19 PM   #2
spenthil
Member
 
Location: San Francisco

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 44
Default

I am no way qualified to answer this question, but can point you to two papers that I have been meaning to read that do cover this:
http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/...meth.1226.html
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../320/5881/1344

Pay particular attention to the idea of "5' bias" and random priming bias - which I think are the biggest problems with current techniques. Of particular note is a comment in the nature paper:
Quote:
RNA fragmentation before copying would also be expected to greatly reduce 5' bias. This protocol gave better overall uniformity than protocols without RNA fragmentation (Supplementary Fig. 1), although some residual and reproducible nonuniformity clearly persists for randomly primed substrates that was not observed in other kinds of Illumina sequencing substrates handled simultaneously, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIPSeq) samples
__________________
--
Senthil Palanisami
spenthil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2010, 09:31 PM   #3
malachig
Senior Member
 
Location: WashU

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 117
Default

RNA-Seq can certainly be used to quantify transcripts and compare between tissues. If your RNA is of high quality and your libraries are sequenced to sufficient depth the outcome is likely to be more reliable and less noisy than microarrays. I worked with microarrays for several years and with RNA-Seq for the last two years. Initially RNA-Seq has some growing pains but in my opinion it now beats microarrays hands down. It does not rely on prior knowledge of gene annotations and it has a better signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity and specificity (if you have enough library depth). Furthermore, in our validations of expression and differential expression estimates from RNA-Seq we found the results to be highly comparable to qPCR.
malachig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chip seq, mrna, mrna-seq, quantitation

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO