SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Ion Torrent



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Miseq Error: No usable signal found in the images; it is possible that clustering has rlopez0218 Illumina/Solexa 13 02-22-2016 06:42 AM
BWA-MEM: output mapped reads larger than input reads Kennels Bioinformatics 9 09-05-2013 06:27 PM
GATK Error: Bad input-no usable data in BAM Cable Bioinformatics 0 07-11-2012 08:10 PM
duplicate reads in Illumina short, single end reads of RNAseq data inbarpl Bioinformatics 4 05-22-2012 09:36 AM
Percentage of usable data per lane greigite Illumina/Solexa 3 03-25-2009 12:38 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2018, 12:16 PM   #1
ferjusa
Junior Member
 
Location: Rome

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3
Default No usable reads

Hi everybody!
I have a problem with my last run (chip 316) on Ion torrent.
I had only a 31% of loading so I thought it was a charge problem.
But in addition I have 0% of usable reads and 3% of live ISPs.
What's the problem? Could it be the dilution factor of my library (64 barcodes) before the emulsion pcr? or it's an upstream problem when preparing libraries?
Many thanks for who can help me.
Isabella
ferjusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2018, 12:53 PM   #2
r.rosati
Member
 
Location: Brazil

Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 69
Default

Ciao Isabella!
Some troubleshooting information can be obtained from the report.
How did the consensus keys look?
Were the test fragments OK (according to the % 50AQ17 and histogram)?
If you want, share the PDF run report, it'd be easier to troubleshoot.
r.rosati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 12:36 PM   #3
ferjusa
Junior Member
 
Location: Rome

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3
Default

Ciaooooo!
Here I attached the PDF run report...horrible!

Could the problem be the dilution factor of my library (64 barcodes) before the emulsion pcr? or maybe the chip loading?

Please help!

Grazie mille
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Auto_user_SN2-73-HCV_04.05.18_282.pdf (611.3 KB, 18 views)
ferjusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 03:11 PM   #4
r.rosati
Member
 
Location: Brazil

Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 69
Default

Ciao Isabella!
I see that the consensus key is very low... I would think that you had an issue with either the polymerase or the sequencing primer... or with the run itself.
You do have a huge % of "no template" ISPs and very low policlonality. You mention the dilution factor of your libraries, do you suspect having used too few DNA at the emulsion PCR step? But then you should have likely removed the empty beads at the ES purification step, having very few ISP left, and you'd see a lot of test fragment ISPs in the run. (Do you by chance save those 2ul of ISPs for the Ion Sphere Quality Control Kit on the Qubit?)
r.rosati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 03:19 PM   #5
r.rosati
Member
 
Location: Brazil

Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 69
Default

P.S.: There's a useful document from the now-defunct IonCommunity called "How to assess a PGM sequencing run report". Do you have it? I don't know where Thermo would be storing it nowadays, if it wasn't lost forever in the pyre.
r.rosati is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO