Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CuffLinks/CuffDiff frag length for single-end reads

    I have 6 samples, single-end RNAseq runs from a SOLiD 4 machine, and mapped using BioScope 1.3. These are a set of 3 treatment animals and 3 controls (mice). These were barcoded samples (2 slides), 50bp reads.

    My aim is to use CuffDiff (1.2.1) to look at differential expression (and I want to compare to DESeq, and maybe other tools as well). But I am wondering what exactly I should enter for the mean fragment length and standard deviation. I've read the posts mentioning this should be the reads plus the adapters, but that makes no sense to me given the BAM files I have from BioScope. The length of the reads plus adapters, barcode and so forth is 127bp, which means nothing relative to what is actually in my input BAM files for this analysis.

    Taking those BAM files (the wt.sr.bam files from BioScope) I used FastQC to get the fragment length distribution for each wt.sr.bam file produced from the BioScope 1.3 mapping runs, dumped the data from FastQC into JMP Genomics and pulled up the distribution stats.

    Sample Mean Length Std. Dev.
    Treatment -1: 46.71 6.31 (~71.9 million map'd reads)
    Treatment -2: 46.59 6.42 (~72.4 million map'd reads)
    Treatment -3: 45.96 7.26 (~77.5 million map'd reads)
    Control -1: 45.41 7.34 (~76.0 million map'd reads)
    Control -2: 45.66 7.36 (~171.6 million map'd reads)
    Control -3: 46.26 6.69 (~109.4 million map'd reads)
    Combined samples: 46.027 6.997

    Now, it seems to me I should be using the values for the combined samples in CuffDiff, as that is derived directly from the reads which CuffDiff will be chewing on? I was thinking I'd set "-m 46 -s 7" in the CuffDiff command.

    Does that seem logical?

    If not, just how does one come up with the fragment length and standard deviation for single end reads?

    Thanks, Michael
    Last edited by mbblack; 12-13-2011, 04:56 PM.
    Michael Black, Ph.D.
    ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

  • #2
    I have the same question. I will wait for the experts to answer.

    Comment


    • #3
      The fragment length is the size of the piece of DNA that was sequenced, which is generally significantly longer than the length of the reads. In a paired end run, you can estimate the fragment length by observing the distance in genome coordinates between mapped reads. In a single end run, the only way you'll know is based on the size range that was selected on a gel during library prep. If, for example, the 300-400 bp band was cut out and adapters are 90 bp, your fragment length is 210-310 bp. The SD can vary depending on how wide the size selection was.

      In this case I would ask whoever prepared the library what the fragment length was. I'm not familiar with the requirements of SOLiD, but there may be a fragment size limit and a size that is usually selected, like Illumina.
      Last edited by polyatail; 12-17-2011, 02:54 PM.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin


        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
        Yesterday, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      39 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      41 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X