SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
optimizing transcriptome assembly peromhc Bioinformatics 2 01-12-2016 03:49 PM
Optimizing DNA Extraction from Dried Insects HannahOish Sample Prep / Library Generation 7 11-11-2015 05:48 AM
MIREAP - optimizing options for different species? tjcarr Bioinformatics 0 09-16-2013 10:41 AM
Optimizing tophat running time kevin9y9 RNA Sequencing 1 03-13-2013 07:09 AM
Optimizing tophat mapping for mixed RNA-Seq data bob-loblaw Bioinformatics 5 02-15-2013 02:22 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2016, 01:26 PM   #1
MCA
Junior Member
 
Location: New York

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1
Default Optimizing on NextSeq

Howdy,

I work for a clinical genomics company, we have a NextSeq 500 and have been trying to squeeze the most reads per sample out of it.

What I've been running:
Multiplexed 24 Human DNA samples
TruSight One enrichment panel, 8bp barcodes, paired end
NextSeq MidOutput Flowcell, run as 2x 150 cycle

We've been consistently been getting:
60Gb data
180million sequences
~70-80% Passing filter
~70-80% Q30
Samples have average 80x coverage of the panel

I've been able to get that high by loading a much higher pM concentration on the flowcell, and finding out at which concentration it begins to overcluster and filter out data.

I'd like to know, is this normal? I assume other labs are trying to maxmize data, dose anyone have similar (or better) results? Illumina seemed tight lipped about our results, neither condemning or condoning us overclustering. We are planning on switching to a HiSeq 3000, would we be able to go beyond (at our own risk) the recommended specs?

I heard that the HiSeq has patterned flowcells, would this set a ceiling to prevent clustering too high?

Also, if you have any NextSeq questions feel free to ask!

-Plunk
MCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2016, 04:04 PM   #2
ScottC
Senior Member
 
Location: Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 246
Default

In our experience, the NextSeq is by far the most tolerant of the Illumina systems in terms of pushing the cluster numbers (second after that is the old GA/II/IIx), although the patterned flowcells of the 3000 might change that. We get similar figures to those you posted on our NextSeq.

Last edited by ScottC; 04-05-2016 at 04:07 PM.
ScottC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
nextseq 500

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO