Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > De novo discovery

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tophat for finding long ncRNA with short reads? KevinLam Bioinformatics 3 02-24-2017 10:11 AM
BIG difference in number of genes mapped with tophat vs. casava 1.8.2 hmortens Bioinformatics 0 07-30-2012 08:24 AM
velvet: 60bp Illimuna reads. -short or -long? Kiroro Bioinformatics 0 09-10-2011 03:10 PM
Velvet and long Illumina reads Peter Bjarke Olsen De novo discovery 15 05-13-2010 11:13 PM
Structural Variant Detection of short and long reads with NextGENe® 2nd Generation S SoftGenetics Vendor Forum 0 09-30-2009 12:32 PM

Thread Tools
Old 02-18-2014, 02:55 PM   #1
Location: Maryland, USA

Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 60
Default Velvet 1.2.10: why the big difference in results with -long vs -short w/ 250bp reads?


I am doing some de novo assembly of a 23 Mb genome using MiSeq paired end Illumina reads (250bp reads, 400bp insert (SD 130)). These reads, however, have been trimmed for quality and range widely in their finished size, with most at about 190bp. Assembly using -long/-longPaired vs -short/shortPaired gives surprisingly different final results. Any ideas why this is happening or which results are more reliable?


velveth Genome1_71 71 -short -fastq  -shortPaired -separate -fastq
velvetg Genome1_71 -exp_cov 43 -ins_length 407 -ins_length_sd 130

velveth Genome1_71 71 -long -fastq  -longPaired -separate -fastq
velvetg Genome1_71 -exp_cov 43 -ins_length_long 407 -ins_length_long_sd 130
Results, short:
Final graph has 128642 nodes and n50 of 17324, max 332339, total 26267561, using 6042595/7501247 reads
Results, long:
Final graph has 148426 nodes and n50 of 1610, max 28675, total 26984545, using 6083488/7501247 reads
Genomics101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 08:31 AM   #2
Location: SE MN

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 44

Zerbino tells us there shouldn't be any difference, but what you've found is interesting.

Have you tried this without the singletons and just the paired reads?

It's interesting that your -long flag increases read utilization and subsequently affects your n50. It's breaking up your reads since you've lost fragments larger than 28675...

Does that 28675 fragment exist in your -short assembly?
ctseto is offline   Reply With Quote

long, short, velvet

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO