![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with BWA mapping of Illumina PE short insert size fragments (FFPE material) | LadyGray | Bioinformatics | 2 | 10-22-2012 02:20 AM |
sequencing of short DNA fragments (40-240bp) | volks | SOLiD | 1 | 09-07-2010 06:04 AM |
Short reads fragments of genome... | hicham | Bioinformatics | 2 | 03-24-2010 05:15 AM |
Removal of large fragments? | seqAll | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 01-13-2010 10:20 PM |
PubMed: Phylogenetic classification of short environmental DNA fragments. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 02-21-2008 06:17 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: germany Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Hi
i have performed amplicon sequencing using gs junior and in the first run they were peaks around 120-150 bp. so in the next run i want to reduce these peaks. i did 2x purification with the ampure beads(0.8: 1 ratio) but still there are slight or faint bands visible in agarose gel. How do i get rid of these bands completely? if i am purifying it more further i am losing my ampliocns which are around 300bp. Please help me. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
|
![]()
You might be able to drop to a lower ratio. Depends on your lot of beads. If you take a DNA ladder of some sort, you can calibrate your batch of beads by trying different ratios. Here is an example:
![]() For this calibration, it looks like the best differentiation between 300 and 150 bp would be around 0.7:1 or 0.75:1. Alternatively you can just cut your band of a desired size out of a gel and extract the DNA from the slice. But that may be more work. Well, maybe not for a single band. But if you had numerous samples it would be. -- Phillip |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: germany Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Hi
Thankyou so much for replying with the 0.8:1, i was able to remove all bands below 250bp , eventhough there is a slight loss of my amplicon samples. but now the problem was with the quantitation of the samples. we used the Nanodrop 2000 to measure the conc of DNA in the purified samples. but the nanodrop values are negative for concentration of DNA. i do not understand this and i am confused with wat procedure shuould i use to quatify my samples? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
|
![]()
A nanodrop spectrophotometer is not useful for quantifying samples below 20 ng/ul or so. Use a fluorimeter, a bioanalyzer chip, and/or your gel. Or qPCR.
-- Phillip |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: germany Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
![]()
Thank you for the reply.
we are thinking to use the picogreen assay fro the quantitation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: Massachusetts Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 116
|
![]()
We use picogreen routinely, then make amplicon pools and quantitate the pools with Kapa qPCR kit. Has been very reliable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Location: germany Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
![]()
i was just reading all the threads and evrybody recomends Kappa kit.
i have a small question regarding this. which kit from the KAPA biosystems is best fro GS junior titanium- LIB A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Location: Massachusetts Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 116
|
![]()
I don't know all the variations and it depends on your cycler; check with the company first if you have trouble sorting out their web site (really needs a decision tree).
We use the FLX version, not the Ti version, with LibA (adapters for LibA/Titanium are like old FLX adapters, not like LibL/Titanium shotgun). Part number is KK4830. This is for ABI Prism qPCR instrument. We have a standard GS-FLX, not Junior. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|