Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with false SNP identification? sasignor De novo discovery 0 02-08-2012 05:45 PM
SNP base calling shuang Bioinformatics 7 10-24-2011 12:50 PM
SNP base calling for multiple samples shuang Bioinformatics 2 09-07-2011 03:06 PM
Lots of false positives with SAMtools SNP discovery mikael Genomic Resequencing 4 02-28-2011 07:38 AM
ti/tv ratio and false positive SNP rate yi2004 Bioinformatics 5 06-21-2010 03:07 AM

Thread Tools
Old 03-08-2012, 09:47 AM   #1
Location: Earth

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11
Question First base of reads SNP or false result?

I am using 5 samples pooled DNA Targeted sequencing data (Illumina FASTQ) and using BWA - GATK for mapping and variant calling. In variant calls (vcf files), I find that at aparticular position of genome, first base of the 900 reads (coverage is 1000X) showing mutation (889 out of 900 were showing altered base) but GATK gives very low QUAL score ~40, while highest QUAL in dataset is something about 20,000.

My question is first base is of high quality base calling and so high altered base count makes it good candidate of mutation. Why does GATK gives so much low QUAL score?
pirates.genome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 09:56 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: San Diego

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 912

I think the first base is mroe likely to be an error than bases a little further in. Or, you have a PCR mistake that became compounded with PCR duplication. Or those reads are misaligned, and really belong somewhere else.

A real SNP should show up in a lot of reads that start at a lot of places.
swbarnes2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 01:27 PM   #3
Location: Earth

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11

Thank you swbarnes2 for explaining why only first base is not so good as variant rather true SNP should be covered by many different reads starting at different positions.

It is targeted sequencing, one of our targeted exon has 900X coverage and mutational hotspot within that exon was our target. Saying in other ways, when we target a very specific region, amplify using PCR and map them back on genome, obviously they show a similar kind of sequence reads, most of them starting at the same position.

Coming to the question, in such type of study, should we believe a variant in the very first base of all reads or not?
pirates.genome is offline   Reply With Quote

first base of fastq, gatk qual, variant

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO