SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cannot Normalize DNA for GBS/RadSeq, Nonsense Qbit results Myrmex Sample Prep / Library Generation 17 03-05-2015 03:47 PM
NGS library prep method for RRS/GBS/RADseq of degraded/ancient DNA? BioGenomics Sample Prep / Library Generation 6 01-14-2015 08:46 PM
Best method to prepare 100-200 bp DNA sample (Micrococcal Nuclease Digested) spf2 Illumina/Solexa 4 05-14-2014 12:22 PM
DNA Shearing Lj Lee Sample Prep / Library Generation 4 04-12-2012 01:01 PM
DNA shearing suludana Illumina/Solexa 18 03-01-2010 06:30 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2016, 05:14 AM   #1
IanAWarren
Member
 
Location: Cambridge

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Default Shearing digested DNA for RADseq

Hello,

I am making libraries for RADseq. I am trying out the Covaris ME220 for shearing the digested DNA. The shearing seems to be highly inefficient compared to what is given in the protocol book (using whole genomic DNA). Does anyone have any advice about ths in general?

I have identified three possible problems:

1) I am starting with digested DNA and I read somewhere that it does not shear as efficiently. The average size of my DNA should be 4096bp and I need to get it to ~500bp

2) Since I am going from the digestion to the ligation and then the shearing directly I still have the old enzymes, buffer, and some rATPs in the mixture.

3) I might be working with a low concentration of DNA, but I do not think this is right. I have about 1ug in 130ul, which is not low concentration to me.

I am going to perform some trial and error and hopefully find a solution, but my initial efforts have proved ineffective. I think i was being too tentative.

Thank you in advance for any help that you can provide
IanAWarren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 07:33 AM   #2
huguesparri
Member
 
Location: Montpellier (France)

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 92
Default

Hello,

Usually, we perform a AMPure XP purification step after the P1 ligation and we do not face any issue with the sonication. Maybe you should give it a try...

H.
huguesparri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 12:00 PM   #3
kerplunk412
Senior Member
 
Location: Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 119
Default

I have Covaris digested DNA of 1-2 kb and it works well. I think your problem is #2.
kerplunk412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 12:15 AM   #4
IanAWarren
Member
 
Location: Cambridge

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Default

Hello,

Thank you for your answers.

What conditions did you use for your Covaris machine? We have not got close to the sizes we want (actually too small now) and we are fine tuning. We have just found that the conditions required are very different from what is given in the protocol book.

I will suggest the purification too.
IanAWarren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 04:19 AM   #5
huguesparri
Member
 
Location: Montpellier (France)

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 92
Default

Usually we use a Bioruptor because it's located in our building.
But we also have access to a S220 in the university. When we used it, the parameters were as follow:
Volume: 130l.
DNA: 1 g.
sonication time: 60 sec.
Duty Cycle : 10% , Intensity (Peak Incident Power), 5 (175), Cycles/Burst 200.

Regards,

H.

PS:
An answer from the IGF of Montpellier to the IGF of Lyon ^^
huguesparri is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
covaris, digested dna, radseq, shearing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO