![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Doing PCR enrichment on PCR-free TruSeq lib? | JBKri | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 10-08-2015 08:00 AM |
TruSeq PCR-free, ligate adapters to amplicons? | JBKri | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 2 | 06-05-2015 10:47 AM |
TrueSeq PCR free POOR LIGATION efficiencies | Degraz | Illumina/Solexa | 3 | 04-08-2015 06:03 AM |
Illumina TruSeq PCR-Free - Low Final Concentration WGS Rat DNA Libraries | agileta | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 11-18-2014 08:11 PM |
PCR-Free Libraries & Bioinformatic PCR Duplicate detection? | aeonsim | Bioinformatics | 3 | 10-23-2013 02:36 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: San Diego Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 15
|
![]()
It seems to be well known that the ligation efficiency of the adapters for the TruSeq PCR-free library prep is low. Bioanalyzer concentrations can be 3-30 fold higher than qPCR. I believe the qPCR concentrations are accurate, however, the sequencing runs are under-clustered. I suspect the libraries are not getting denatured properly. Has anyone had this happen?
My theory is that the NaOH is being used up on the DNA fragments with no adapters and therefore less NaOH is available to denature the libraries. Thanks, Karrie |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: CT Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 237
|
![]()
what kind of samples? I'm fighting with difficult really high gc bacteria that I've truseq pcr free prepped. Ive started heat denaturing after NaOH denaturing. it may be helping a bit? I'm still testing the libraries by spiking them in other runs, haven't tried this on its own run yet
__________________
Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|