Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cluster density variation

    Since a few weeks we occasionally observe very big variation between raw cluster densities on our Single read flow cells.
    Even if we load multiple lanes from the same library tube we sometimes see this. eg. variation was between 730K/mm2 and 164K/mm2 loaded from the same tube!!

    Also aliquoted Phi-X for a dedicated control lanes sometimes has as little as 20k/mm2 clusters where it should be 500k/mm2.
    aliquoting is something we do for years now with reproducible results up until a few weeks ago.
    We only observe this with single read flow cells. We never see this with PE flow cells.

    We used different sequencers, fluidics on cBot and sequencers are always checked and OK. Still we observe this, and can't get it under control.
    Illumina is not aware of a SR flow cell issue, and also has no clue how to control this.

    Has anybody seen this as well, or has anybody a clue what could be causing cluster density variation?

  • #2
    We saw wild cluster density variation on MiSeq until Illlumina instructed us (with a new method) to carryover less NaOH.

    Our experience may not be applicable to you. If NaOH carryover is not applicable, check pH of your NaOH...assuming NaOH is used for HiSeq???
    Last edited by IDDan; 04-22-2013, 11:42 AM. Reason: Grammar

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi HeinKey,

      Are these variations being observed on the same flowcell but different lanes? We occasionally load multiple lanes with same library from the same dilution and it should always perform quiet constantly. One of my guesses is when there are smears of dirty spots on the flowcell it can severely damage the machine's ability to calculate viable clusters. We have seen that on GA when oil was not loaded well (or sometimes the oil stick on thermal station and create smears on flowcell as the run progress).

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by IDDan View Post
        We saw wild cluster density variation on MiSeq until Illlumina instructed us (with a new method) to carryover less NaOH.

        Our experience may not be applicable to you. If NaOH carryover is not applicable, check pH of your NaOH...assuming NaOH is used for HiSeq???
        IDDan; thx for your response.
        We see cluster density variation within a single flow cell. Variation between lanes loaded from the same diluted single stranded library. Mixed well!
        If NaOH is accidized I would expect to see only variation between individually denaturated libraries.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Anguy View Post
          Hi HeinKey,

          Are these variations being observed on the same flowcell but different lanes? We occasionally load multiple lanes with same library from the same dilution and it should always perform quiet constantly. One of my guesses is when there are smears of dirty spots on the flowcell it can severely damage the machine's ability to calculate viable clusters. We have seen that on GA when oil was not loaded well (or sometimes the oil stick on thermal station and create smears on flowcell as the run progress).
          Hi Anguy,
          Thnx for your response.
          I agree with you that local disturbances would result in cluster density variation. I checked images and cluster density plots. This all looks normal with equally spread clusters all over the lanes, just in much lower densities. so I still doubt if the Single Read flow cells were OK here. Are the grafted oligo's in lower concentration, or damaged? and why only in Single Read flow cells?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
            by seqadmin


            The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
            Yesterday, 07:01 AM
          • seqadmin
            Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
            by seqadmin


            Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
            04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
          0 responses
          51 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X