Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CEAS giving strange graphical output when supplying --gn-groups

    I'm trying to run CEAS on two different sets of genes that are present in my ChIP-seq, but it seems as though I'm doing something incorrectly. When I run CEAS without the --gn-groups parameter, I get great results. I see reasonable looking profiles in the wiggle section of the .pdf output.

    However, when I run CEAS with the --gn-groups parameter and two lists of genes, the average profiles don't look right at all. Both gene groups are simply graphed as perfectly vertical lines. This is definitely not correct, they should have a broad looking profile.

    Here's my command line:

    ceas --name CEAS_TSGTDG --gn-groups=TSG_list.txt,TDG_list.txt --gn-group-names='TSG,TDG' -g ../../../hg19.refGene -b MACSpeaks.bed -w MACS2_treat_pileup.wig

    I know that my bed and wig files are good, because I get good output without supplying --gn-groups. I'm wondering if I'm not using the proper format for my "TSG_list.txt" and "TDG_list.txt"? They're simply a list of gene names followed by newlines. Here's an excerpt of TDG_list.txt:

    BZRAP1
    PEX13
    NEK4
    RNASEH2B
    C12orf57

    Am I doing something wrong?

  • #2
    Originally posted by jereeder View Post
    I'm trying to run CEAS on two different sets of genes that are present in my ChIP-seq, but it seems as though I'm doing something incorrectly. When I run CEAS without the --gn-groups parameter, I get great results. I see reasonable looking profiles in the wiggle section of the .pdf output.

    However, when I run CEAS with the --gn-groups parameter and two lists of genes, the average profiles don't look right at all. Both gene groups are simply graphed as perfectly vertical lines. This is definitely not correct, they should have a broad looking profile.

    Here's my command line:

    ceas --name CEAS_TSGTDG --gn-groups=TSG_list.txt,TDG_list.txt --gn-group-names='TSG,TDG' -g ../../../hg19.refGene -b MACSpeaks.bed -w MACS2_treat_pileup.wig

    I know that my bed and wig files are good, because I get good output without supplying --gn-groups. I'm wondering if I'm not using the proper format for my "TSG_list.txt" and "TDG_list.txt"? They're simply a list of gene names followed by newlines. Here's an excerpt of TDG_list.txt:

    BZRAP1
    PEX13
    NEK4
    RNASEH2B
    C12orf57

    Am I doing something wrong?
    I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by hartmaier View Post
      I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?
      Same issue here. I guess no one has figured this out yet. :/

      Comment


      • #4
        You may found my package interesting. https://github.com/GuangchuangYu/ChIPseeker

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by hartmaier View Post
          I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?
          I found out what was going on in my case. Essentially, the gene identifiers in the group file were not the same type as in the refgene file. I was using the refgene files from UCSC, which uses refseq mrna nomenclature, but my group text files had ensembl_gene_ids.

          I converted the gene names in the group files to refseq mrna ids and the problem was solved.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
            by seqadmin




            The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
            04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
          • seqadmin
            Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
            by seqadmin


            Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
            04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, Today, 08:47 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
          0 responses
          60 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
          0 responses
          59 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X