![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FPKM is 0, when using cufflinks in galaxy on the net | chenyao | Bioinformatics | 1 | 12-04-2012 07:12 AM |
cufflinks FPKM >>> Cuffdiff FPKM | peromhc | Bioinformatics | 6 | 10-17-2012 02:07 PM |
Cufflinks and cuffdiff FPKM values | combiochem | Bioinformatics | 12 | 10-14-2012 12:37 AM |
cufflinks-1.0.3 produces very high FPKM values when compared to cufflinks-0.9.3. Why? | pinki999 | Bioinformatics | 5 | 06-09-2012 07:48 AM |
Fpkm differences between versions of Cufflinks | zorph | Bioinformatics | 1 | 02-15-2012 03:19 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Moon Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 60
|
![]()
After cufflinks and cuffcompare, every transcripts were assigned their FPKM numbers, some papers used the longest transcripts to present the gene FPKM, others used the transcript with highest FPKM to present the gene FPKM; my first question is which one is better if comparing expression differentiation.
I also used CuffDiff, there are FPKM tracking files, and it is said that the FPKM for expression comparison is a sum of all the trascript FPKM, is this way better than those as above? Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|