Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Extract contrast from DESeq2 advanced design

    Dear all,

    I wish to analyze RNAseq experiment data with complex matrix design. The matrix I wish to analyze is the same as displayed in the edgeR documentation section 3.5:
    Code:
       Disease  Patient Treatment
    1  Healthy  1       None
    2  Healthy  1       Hormone
    3  Healthy  2       None
    4  Healthy  2       Hormone
    5  Healthy  3       None
    6  Healthy  3       Hormone
    7  Disease1 4       None
    8  Disease1 4       Hormone
    9  Disease1 5       None
    10 Disease1 5       Hormone
    11 Disease1 6       None
    12 Disease1 6       Hormone
    13 Disease2 7       None
    14 Disease2 7       Hormone
    15 Disease2 8       None
    16 Disease2 8       Hormone
    17 Disease2 9       None
    18 Disease2 9       Hormone
    So, to analyse this kind of matrix design with DESeq2, I have followed the instructions in the DESeq2 vignette section 3.12.1. Creating a "nested" Patient variable (called PN) like that:
    Code:
    > dm
       Disease  PN Treatment
    1  Healthy  P1 None
    2  Healthy  P1 Hormone
    3  Healthy  P2 None
    4  Healthy  P2 Hormone
    5  Healthy  P3 None
    6  Healthy  P3 Hormone
    7  Disease1 P1 None
    8  Disease1 P1 Hormone
    9  Disease1 P2 None
    10 Disease1 P2 Hormone
    11 Disease1 P3 None
    12 Disease1 P3 Hormone
    13 Disease2 P1 None
    14 Disease2 P1 Hormone
    15 Disease2 P2 None
    16 Disease2 P2 Hormone
    17 Disease2 P3 None
    18 Disease2 P3 Hormone
    and using the following design formulae to analyse with DESeq2:
    Code:
    > df
    ~ Disease + Disease:PN + Disease:Treatment
    Using this design matrix and formulae, I got the following output from the resultsNames function:
    Code:
    > dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData=rawData, colData=dm, design=df) 
    > dds <- DESeq(dds, quiet=TRUE)
    > resultsNames(dds)
    [1] "Intercept"             "Disease_Disease2_vs_Disease1"  "Disease_Healthy_vs_Disease1"   "DiseaseDisease1.PNP2"         
    [5] "DiseaseDisease2.PNP2"  "DiseaseHealthy.PNP2"           "DiseaseDisease1.PNP3"          "DiseaseDisease2.PNP3"         
    [9] "DiseaseHealthy.PNP3"   "DiseaseDisease1.TraitmentNone" "DiseaseDisease2.TraitmentNone" "DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentNone"
    So, now I can extract comparisons DiseaseDisease1.TraitmentNone vs DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentNone and DiseaseDisease2.TraitmentNone vs DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentNone, using contrast option of results function.

    However, I'm also interested in comparisons DiseaseDisease1.TraitmentHormone vs DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentHormone and DiseaseDisease2.TraitmentHormone vs DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentHormone. To get these comparisons, I have rerun a DESeq2 analyses after inverting the factor levels from the Treatment condition. So, now I can access to the other ones:
    Code:
    > dm$Traitment
    [1] None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone
    Levels: Hormone None
    > dm$Traitment <- relevel(dm$Traitment,'None')
    > dm$Traitment
    [1] None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone None Hormone
    Levels: None Hormone
    > dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData=rawdata, colData=dm, design=df) 
    > dds <- DESeq(dds, quiet=TRUE)
    > resultsNames(dds)
    [1] "Intercept"             "Disease_Disease2_vs_Disease1"     "Disease_Healthy_vs_Disease1"      "DiseaseDisease1.PNP2"            
    [5] "DiseaseDisease2.PNP2"  "DiseaseHealthy.PNP2"              "DiseaseDisease1.PNP3"             "DiseaseDisease2.PNP3"            
    [9] "DiseaseHealthy.PNP3"   "DiseaseDisease1.TraitmentHormone" "DiseaseDisease2.TraitmentHormone" "DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentHormone"
    I wish to know if it is the right way to get the requested comparisons?
    Because I have seen that the results between (1) DiseaseDisease1.TraitmentNone vs DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentNone and (2) DiseaseDisease2.TraitmentHormone vs DiseaseHealthy.TraitmentHormone are nearly the same:

    Code:
     (1)        (2)
     0,268438  -0,268438
     0,141639  -0,141639
     0,000000   0,000000
    -0,696627   0,696634
     0,000000  -0,973195
     0,034611  -0,034611
     0,530830  -0,530829
    -0,118112   0,118113
    -0,016033   0,016033
     0,270009  -0,270009
     3,021271  -3,021392
     0,000000   0,000000
     0,000000   0,000000
     1,617347  -1,617340
    -0,491919   0,491938
    -0,380177   0,380001
     0,528211  -0,528204
    -0,052266   0,052266
     0,204210  -0,204210
     0,267654  -0,267591
     0,012433  -0,012432
    -0,046289   0,046290
     ...
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    For information, I use R version 3.3.0 (2016-05-03) and DESeq2_1.12.4.

  • #2
    Hello Michel,

    While your way of doing it can be correct, maybe you can use a much simpler way to perform this analysis.

    For example, you can extract DiseaseDisease1.TreatmentNone and DiseaseHealthy.TreatmentNone's samples into one matrix. Then, create a much less complicated design matrix to compare them. (1 condition vs 1 condition) This way, you will definitely know that you are doing the right thing.

    Best,

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you for your answer.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin


        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
        Yesterday, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      39 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      41 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X