BackgroundThis study compared the performance of five commercially available kits in extracting total RNA from small eukaryotic tissue samples (<15?mg). Total RNA was isolated from fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) tissues (spleen, blood, kidney, embryo, and larvae) using the Qiagen RNeasy? Plus Mini, Qiagen RNeasy? Plus Universal, Promega Maxwell? 16 LEV simplyRNA, Ambion MagMAX?-96 and Promega SimplyRNA HT kits. Kit performance was evaluated via measures of RNA quantity (e.g., total RNA amount) and quality (e.g., ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280?nm, RNA integrity number (RIN), presence of gDNA).ResultsWith the exception of embryos, each kit generally extracted ?5??g of total RNA from each sample. With regard to RNA quality, the RINs of RNA samples isolated via the Plus Mini and Maxwell? 16 kits were consistently higher than those of samples extracted via the remaining three kits and for all tissues, these kits produced intact RNA with average RIN values ?7. The Plus Universal and SimplyRNA HT kits produced moderately degraded (RIN values <7, but ?5), while the RNA recovered via the MagMAX? kit tended to exhibit a high degree of degradation (RIN values <5).ConclusionsEach kit was generally capable of extracting the amount of RNA required for most downstream gene expression applications suggesting that RNA yield is unlikely to be a limiting factor for any of the kits evaluated. However, differences in the quality of RNA extracted via each of the kits indicate that these kits may differ in their ability to yield RNA acceptable for some applications. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate that there are practical differences between commercially available RNA extraction kits that should be taken into account when selecting extraction methods to be used for isolating RNA designated for gene expression analysis.
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Article on totalRNA isolation kits
BackgroundThis study compared the performance of five commercially available kits in extracting total RNA from small eukaryotic tissue samples (<15?mg). Total RNA was isolated from fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) tissues (spleen, blood, kidney, embryo, and larvae) using the Qiagen RNeasy? Plus Mini, Qiagen RNeasy? Plus Universal, Promega Maxwell? 16 LEV simplyRNA, Ambion MagMAX?-96 and Promega SimplyRNA HT kits. Kit performance was evaluated via measures of RNA quantity (e.g., total RNA amount) and quality (e.g., ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280?nm, RNA integrity number (RIN), presence of gDNA).ResultsWith the exception of embryos, each kit generally extracted ?5??g of total RNA from each sample. With regard to RNA quality, the RINs of RNA samples isolated via the Plus Mini and Maxwell? 16 kits were consistently higher than those of samples extracted via the remaining three kits and for all tissues, these kits produced intact RNA with average RIN values ?7. The Plus Universal and SimplyRNA HT kits produced moderately degraded (RIN values <7, but ?5), while the RNA recovered via the MagMAX? kit tended to exhibit a high degree of degradation (RIN values <5).ConclusionsEach kit was generally capable of extracting the amount of RNA required for most downstream gene expression applications suggesting that RNA yield is unlikely to be a limiting factor for any of the kits evaluated. However, differences in the quality of RNA extracted via each of the kits indicate that these kits may differ in their ability to yield RNA acceptable for some applications. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate that there are practical differences between commercially available RNA extraction kits that should be taken into account when selecting extraction methods to be used for isolating RNA designated for gene expression analysis.
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
-
by seqadmin
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...-
Channel: Articles
03-22-2024, 06:39 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
31 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
33 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
53 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment