Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nextera

    Has anyone used Nextera library prep for illumina? I'm looking to test but any info on biases or other data would be welcome.

  • #2
    We tried it. If you don't have a Covaris it might be worthwhile. It is very easy and fast but it doesn't give a tight size distribution.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks.

      We do have a covaris but it's the price. We have to charge a wet lab hourly rate. If nextera can cut 2-4 hours off library making it might be useful.
      I suppose we could use an ez-gel to tighten the size range.

      Comment


      • #4
        You can control the size distribution of the library, based on the buffer used (see our blog post for Bioanalyzer traces). If you want to tighten up the size range further, you could use Ampure XP.
        Connect with Epicentre: Facebook | Twitter

        Comment


        • #5
          I would use the HMW buffer, never the LMW buffer for Illumina prep. The peak at 200 represents 135 bp of the Nextera adapters and 65 bp of insert. I have had to use the HMW buffer and do size selection. Be careful if you do Size Selection post PCR, you do not have overages to re-amplify and the standard PE PCR Primers will not work.

          Comment


          • #6
            Starting with the recommended amount of DNA for Nextera (50 ng), you should get 300-500 ng of "tagmented" DNA after 9 cycles of PCR. We have some customers who don't bother with size selection, and get good sequencing results--they find that a tight size distribution is not necessary for Illumina sequencing in their application. However, it's your choice.

            Also, in response to the original point, Nextera will definitely save 2-4 hours compared to Covaris + adaptor ligation.
            Connect with Epicentre: Facebook | Twitter

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
              by seqadmin


              Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
              04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
            • seqadmin
              Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
              by seqadmin


              Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
              03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
            0 responses
            47 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X