![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oxford Nanopore to introduce "disruptive technology" at AGBT | GW_OK | The Pipeline | 104 | 11-08-2020 08:52 AM |
Why GC bias affect the read coverage in RNA-SEQ ? | mozart | General | 8 | 04-26-2019 02:31 AM |
Swing by and introduce yourself! | ECO | Introductions | 373 | 04-16-2012 11:09 AM |
GC coverage bias: difference between 2008 (36mers) and 2010 (75mers) data | BaCh | Illumina/Solexa | 13 | 05-19-2010 12:53 PM |
can some one introduce me to next generation sequencing?? | chanderbio | General | 4 | 08-26-2009 07:36 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
|
![]()
I have a graphic that show an increase in coverge of A over T, and It increses until the end sequence, in all lanes of paired ends runs of 72 pb. Can GAIIx introduce a bias in coverage A on T?
Last edited by vjimenez; 05-12-2011 at 07:55 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Location: berlin Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 156
|
![]() Quote:
An older dataset (of lower quality) of our is different, with C considerably over G, and T slightly over A. I don't know if this is an effect from the base-caller or if it's from the adapter sequences, but it's there, around 1% difference. How much of a gap are you seeing? Last edited by tonybolger; 05-18-2011 at 05:09 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Location: berlin Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 156
|
![]() Quote:
I guess if you're only seeing it in genomic data, it could be related to the specific adapters used. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
bias, coverage |
Thread Tools | |
|
|