|
|
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cost/run on HiSeq 2500 | Zimbobo | Illumina/Solexa | 32 | 01-13-2014 05:54 AM |
| How to circumvent Maintenance Wash on HiSeq 2500? | pmiguel | Illumina/Solexa | 11 | 08-01-2013 08:50 AM |
| HiSeq 2500 Upgrade Materials List | ECO | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 11-16-2012 03:12 PM |
| Help to analyze Illumina HiSeq 2000 Human data | kiradi | Bioinformatics | 4 | 12-09-2011 04:30 AM |
| Hiseq 2000 paired-end capture data analysis problem-too many variants! | lazyworm | Bioinformatics | 1 | 08-11-2010 10:03 AM |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
02-04-2013, 02:03 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Location: Chicago Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
|
Concerns for combining data from HiSeq 2000 and HiSeq 2500
What are the concerns of combining data that was run on a HiSeq 2000 and HiSeq 2500? We ran several samples 6 months ago on a HiSeq 2000 (one per lane, single-end). Our Sequencing Core recently upgraded their machines to HiSeq 2500. If we run other samples on the HiSeq 2500, how comparable is the data to that generated on HiSeq 2000? We use Bowtie, TopHat, DESeq as our pipeline after it comes off the HiSeq.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. -Josh |
|
|
|
02-04-2013, 02:56 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 186
|
There shouldn't be any differences between the HiSeq 2000 and HiSeq 2500 in high output mode. The only change is the addition of the 2 lane rapid run mode, which may have different results due to the differences in read depth per lane.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
