Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cuffdiff splicing.diff

    Hello everyone,

    I just want to clarify the differences between two of the cuffdiff output files, splicing.diff and isoform_exp.diff. Splicing.diff tests whether or not the relative contribution of different isoforms is significantly different between treatments independent of the expression level of that gene (eg tissue 1 is 80/20 for two isoforms and tissue 2 is 50/50). Isoform_exp.diff tests if the expression level of the isoforms is different, this might say there is a significant difference in isoform levels even if the ratio of the different isoforms is the same across treatments. Do I have this correct/clear enough?

    Also, in both cases I am getting the majority of isoforms are coming out as a NOTEST. Could I be doing something wrong or do I just not have enough depth?

    thanks in advance!

  • #2
    Originally posted by Greg View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I just want to clarify the differences between two of the cuffdiff output files, splicing.diff and isoform_exp.diff. Splicing.diff tests whether or not the relative contribution of different isoforms is significantly different between treatments independent of the expression level of that gene (eg tissue 1 is 80/20 for two isoforms and tissue 2 is 50/50). Isoform_exp.diff tests if the expression level of the isoforms is different, this might say there is a significant difference in isoform levels even if the ratio of the different isoforms is the same across treatments. Do I have this correct/clear enough?

    Also, in both cases I am getting the majority of isoforms are coming out as a NOTEST. Could I be doing something wrong or do I just not have enough depth?

    thanks in advance!
    If the ratio is constant.. How can you say individual isoforms changes..?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
    • seqadmin
      Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
      by seqadmin


      Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
      03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X