Go Back   SEQanswers > General
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PubMed: 'Next-generation' sequencing becomes 'now-generation'. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 01-22-2012 02:23 AM
PubMed: Sequencing of BAC pools by different next generation sequencing platforms and Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 10-18-2011 10:10 AM
3rd Annual Next Generation Sequencing Congress London, 14th & 15th November RossMcIvor Events / Conferences 1 08-11-2011 05:31 AM
3rd Anniversary of SEQanswers! ECO Site Announcements 6 12-30-2010 02:31 PM
Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing div1982 Literature Watch 0 04-23-2009 06:39 AM

Thread Tools
Old 07-01-2011, 01:21 AM   #1
Location: Berlin

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 14
Question Is there a clear definition of 3rd generation sequencing?


I have a question...
Is there a real definition of what 3rd generation sequencing is?
Or is it just depending on which company you ask? Some say single molecule sequencing is 3rd gen, some say 3rd gen is when you don't need light anymore for detection...

So you can put IonTorrent, Nanopores into third when going for non-light and PacBio, Helicos into 2nd gen.
Or you use the single molecule argument and kick back IonTorrent into 2nd put Helicos, Nanopores and PacBio into 3rd...
mucku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 02:30 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: Birmingham, UK

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 356

I think "we'll know it when we see it". Don't think it's about light / not-light.

I think true 3rd gen would be: single molecule, massive throughput, low cost.

PacBio is nearly there.

But probably not the others. Ion Torrent is 2.5G, I think.

Everyone expects Nanopore to be "true 3G" when it releases.

Just my 2p!
nickloman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 04:26 AM   #3
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,143

Time to let go of the "generation" part?

But if one must: Think of what is *not* currently "shipping/generally available" as simply the "next-gen".
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 05:14 AM   #4
Location: Berlin

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 14

Originally Posted by GenoMax View Post
Time to let go of the "generation" part?
I guess you are right... the generation length has probably become too short anyways with all the new sequencing methods popping up... let's just call it post-Sanger sequencing...
mucku is offline   Reply With Quote

third gen

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO