Go Back   SEQanswers > Literature Watch
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PubMed: Bacterial community composition and diversity of a full-scale integrated fixe Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 01-05-2011 06:20 AM
PubMed: Novel Microbial Diversity Retrieved by Autonomous Robotic Exploration of the Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 03-20-2010 02:00 AM
PubMed: Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 08-12-2009 05:00 AM
PubMed: Community analysis of chronic wound bacteria using 16S rRNA gene-based pyrose Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 08-04-2009 05:00 AM
PubMed: Exploring Microbial Diversity and Taxonomy Using SSU rRNA Hypervariable Tag S Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 11-22-2008 05:02 AM

Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2011, 06:10 AM   #1
RSS Posting Maniac

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,443
Default PubMed: Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity.

Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity.

ISME J. 2011 Jun 16;

Authors: Degnan PH, Ochman H

Microbes commonly exist in milieus of varying complexity and diversity. Although cultivation-based techniques have been unable to accurately capture the true diversity within microbial communities, these deficiencies have been overcome by applying molecular approaches that target the universally conserved 16S ribosomal RNA gene. The recent application of 454 pyrosequencing to simultaneously sequence thousands of 16S rDNA sequences (pyrotags) has revolutionized the characterization of complex microbial communities. To date, studies based on 454 pyrotags have dominated the field, but sequencing platforms that generate many more sequence reads at much lower costs have been developed. Here, we use the Illumina sequencing platform to design a strategy for 16S amplicon analysis (iTags), and assess its generality, practicality and potential complications. We fabricated and sequenced paired-end libraries of amplified hyper-variable 16S rDNA fragments from sets of samples that varied in their contents, ranging from a single bacterium to highly complex communities. We adopted an approach that allowed us to evaluate several potential sources of errors, including sequencing artifacts, amplification biases, non-corresponding paired-end reads and mistakes in taxonomic classification. By considering each source of error, we delineate ways to make biologically relevant and robust conclusions from the millions of sequencing reads that can be readily generated by this technology.

PMID: 21677692 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Newsbot! is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO