![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange maq 7.1 problem | homeriq5 | Bioinformatics | 7 | 11-26-2013 07:19 AM |
Cufflinks / Cuffdiff problem | Morten | Bioinformatics | 42 | 07-13-2013 10:51 PM |
Problem with Cufflinks output | admiral | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 06-01-2011 01:19 PM |
strange bowtie index building and mapping problem | Gangcai | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-04-2010 05:02 PM |
Problem with Tophat and Cufflinks | gongchang | RNA Sequencing | 2 | 06-08-2010 04:16 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
|
![]()
HI, all
I am facing a strange problem for cufflinks: Reads that are aligned to exons obviously can NOT be counted by cufflinks. Please see if you have the same problem when running the following test. A simple test SAM file (htt.sam) Code:
HWUSI-EAS623:1:91:16574:8737#0 16 chr4 3129018 255 40M * 0 0 AGCTGGCTGCTTCTTCAGGGGTTTCCACTCCAGGGTCAGC @BBBCE-EEEDGGGDDFGEFGFGAGGGGGEGGGGGGGGDF NM:i:0 NH:i:1 XS:A:- HWUSI-EAS623:1:5:14642:7499#0 0 chr4 3129040 255 40M * 0 0 TTCCACTCCAGGGTCAGCAGGTCATGACATCATCACAGAA GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGFF NM:i:0 NH:i:1 XS:A:- HWUSI-EAS623:1:27:15057:20736#0 16 chr4 3129048 255 40M * 0 0 CAGGGTCAGCAGGTCATGACATCATCACAGAACAGCCACG EAEEEEEEBEEEGEGEEEBEEEEEEFEGBGGEGFGGGGGG NM:i:0 NH:i:1 XS:A:- HWUSI-EAS623:1:117:13132:3189#0 16 chr4 3129072 255 40M * 0 0 TCACATAACAGCCACGGTCACAGCACACACTGCACGCGGA @B@CB7EEEEGGGEGGGGGGGGGGGECECECDDD*BBBBB NM:i:2 NH:i:1 XS:A:- htt_ENST00000355072.gtf The reads in SAM file are obviously resided in the exonic region of GTF file (see UCSC screenshot) ![]() However, running cufflinks command Code:
cufflinks --GTF htt_ENST00000355072.gtf htt.sam Code:
$ cat genes.expr gene_id bundle_id chr left right FPKM FPKM_conf_lo FPKM_conf_hi status ENSG00000197386 3 chr4 3076406 3245676 0 0 0 OK Thanks for helps ahead. Last edited by sterding; 12-02-2010 at 10:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Vienna Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 86
|
![]()
I had somehow similar problem.
I had few thousands reads which fall on specific splice junction belonging to just one transcript. However, as mentioned above, Cufflinks was blind to them. The FPKM value was suspiciously close to zero for this transcript. I reported this to Cole Trapnell few weeks ago. So far no response ![]() If somebody know what is the problem I would appreciate such knowledge.
__________________
Pawel Labaj |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Denmark Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 105
|
![]()
I'm not certain, but I think this is because Cufflinks considers 4 reads in total within a gene as below detection threshold. In cuffdiff, you can adjust this by the "-c" options, but cufflinks doesn't have this, probably because it needs a certain amount of reads to assemble transcripts and doesn't simply count reads within a gene.
Try running Cuffdiff with "-c 2", it should be able to produce an FPKM value then (which will be very close to zero in any case if there is only 4 reads in total). The default -c value is 1000, btw. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 36
|
![]()
Thanks a lot, Tom
I am re-running cuffdiff using -c option as you suggested, see what FPKM it will get. meanwhile, I checked the problematic genes; there are reasonable numbers of reads mapped with its exons (see below). Actually the signal is quite clear for me. I wish Tole can open an option for minimal number of reads in cufflinks. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|