![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bioinformatics Freelance & Industry Positions | magnusinformatics | Introductions | 0 | 10-05-2015 10:01 AM |
BioInformatics & Epigenomics Postdoc Researcher | VARI-Employment | Academic/Non-Profit Jobs | 0 | 09-09-2015 10:47 AM |
Postdoc Bioinformatics & Medical Epigenomics | Binia Maria Günther | Academic/Non-Profit Jobs | 0 | 05-12-2015 04:50 AM |
Bioinformatics Investigator Position in Oncology R&D | OncoGenomics | Academic/Non-Profit Jobs | 0 | 08-26-2013 07:10 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Edinburgh, UK Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hello! I've just started a PhD in DNA sequencing for the identification of cancer biomarkers and I was hoping to get some advice on bioinformatic methods. Part of my experimental design is to carry out Nanopore sequencing and I'm quite new to long-read sequencing and bioinformatics. I'd originally planned to use the 'easy' bioinformatic pipeline as advertised by Nanopore so I could practice/learn command line but not miss out on sequencing samples, however I've also noticed its not common to see it in journals or discussions.
Why is this? Would I be unable to publish data analysed with epi2me? Is it better if I sequence the samples THEN carry out bioinformatic analysis when I'm more confident in it? Thanks!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|