![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
correcting for gene-length and GC-content bias in DESeq2 | Golsheed | Bioinformatics | 5 | 01-19-2015 03:25 PM |
FastQC: 3' bias (weird peaks) in Kmer content graphics | Ann7 | RNA Sequencing | 2 | 06-19-2013 05:31 AM |
RNA-seq and GC content bias | federete | RNA Sequencing | 3 | 03-01-2013 06:24 AM |
explain unimodal GC-content bias | shuteo | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 08-29-2012 12:43 PM |
RNA-Seq: Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 02-11-2012 02:00 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Cracov, PL Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 5
|
![]()
Hi! I have samples sequenced with NextSeq for the experiment protocol setup. We tested different kits (Nextera, Kapa, Qiagen) and apart from the donor samples, we sequenced ATCC bacterial mix with the addition of human cells, as well as ATCC genomic DNA. What I observe in QC reports is first of all, per base sequence content bias, but also disturbing GC content distributions for ATCC samples (yellow ones are the bacterial mix, the red one is genomic DNA). Would that suggest contamination or some other issue, or could it be a characteristic of those samples?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
bioinformatics, gc content bias, metagenomics, quality control |
Thread Tools | |
|
|