![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Alternative to NEB Blunt/TA ligase for ONT Rapid Sequencing Kit | jrb71 | Oxford Nanopore | 1 | 12-23-2016 01:30 AM |
Reagents in Rapid SR cluster and Rapid SBS kit | biancaneve | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 11-26-2014 04:49 AM |
PubMed: A rapid and cost-effective method for sequencing pooled cDNA clones by using | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 01-06-2012 04:40 AM |
low cDNA concentration after the RAPID protocol | dina | 454 Pyrosequencing | 0 | 07-11-2010 11:48 AM |
rapid cDNA library normalization? | AKroxy | 454 Pyrosequencing | 1 | 04-08-2010 10:55 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: Worcester, MA Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 135
|
![]()
We haven't done RNA-seq with the minion yet, but have an extra Rapid Sequencing kit lying around. I am wondering if there's anything "wrong" with creating our own cDNA and then sequencing it with the Rapid Kit, rather than using the one of the cDNA Sequencing Kits.
We are interested in some isoforms between two samples and thought this might be a creative solution with the kit we have in hand. Any suggestions would be appreciated! Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Worcester, MA Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 135
|
![]()
To answer my own question, after thinking about this more...
This kit includes a fragmentation step, which would result in cDNA fragmentation and limit sequencing cDNA of full in tact isoforms. There's a risk the isoforms we're interested in will be fragmented. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
David Eccles (gringer)
Location: Wellington, New Zealand Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 843
|
![]()
Also, the cDNA kits are a stranded sequencing process (different adapter sequences for forward and reverse); you'd lose that benefit by using either the ligation kit or rapid kit on pre-prepared cDNA.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
isoform, minion, oxford nanopore, rna-seq |
Thread Tools | |
|
|