Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tag counts for RNA seq experiment

    Hi all
    We have to design an experiment to sequence the transcriptomes of 2 different cell types to know what genes are differentially expressed.

    ABI recommends different Tag numbers (mappable reads) for different applications but they don't specify the exact (atleast approximate) mappable reads required to survey for different applications.

    So to study the differentially expressed genes in different cell types what is the recommended mappable reads or tags we need to get a good coverage.

    Thanks for the suggestions

  • #2
    Originally posted by sanush View Post
    Hi all
    We have to design an experiment to sequence the transcriptomes of 2 different cell types to know what genes are differentially expressed.

    ABI recommends different Tag numbers (mappable reads) for different applications but they don't specify the exact (atleast approximate) mappable reads required to survey for different applications.

    So to study the differentially expressed genes in different cell types what is the recommended mappable reads or tags we need to get a good coverage.

    Thanks for the suggestions
    In case you missed my answer in the other thread you started:

    http://seqanswers.com/forums/showpos...53&postcount=7

    Here is what I posted:

    Brian Coullahan, Lifetech Application Specialist, gave a talk at the 2009 SOLiD Summit in September. He recommended:

    SREK 10-20 million mapped reads
    SWTAK 10-100 million
    SOLiD SAGE 2-5 million
    --
    Phillip

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks Phillip
      I have that slide too, but it gives us a range 10 - 100 M. Is there any specifics like the number of mappable reads required for different applications... what difference can we see in final data with lower reads and higher reads.

      My question is should we have to aim for higher reads(90M) or around 30-40M reads, because as we go for high reads then we need to load 1 sample in multiple segments in quad slide which could increase the cost of the experiment.

      Really appreciate your suggestion

      Subu

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by sanush View Post
        Thanks Phillip
        I have that slide too, but it gives us a range 10 - 100 M. Is there any specifics like the number of mappable reads required for different applications... what difference can we see in final data with lower reads and higher reads.

        My question is should we have to aim for higher reads(90M) or around 30-40M reads, because as we go for high reads then we need to load 1 sample in multiple segments in quad slide which could increase the cost of the experiment.

        Really appreciate your suggestion

        Subu
        It is hard to say.
        For polyA+ RNA 30M should be plenty unless you are focused on transcripts with low relative abundance (below, say, 10 transcripts per million), I would think. For non-polyA+ RNA (eg, ribominus) for which you also need information on poly-adenylated messages--then maybe you would want to get closer to 100M because structural RNAs will occupy a large proportion of your sequence space.

        You can always add more sequence later if you don't have enough.

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
          by seqadmin




          The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
          04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, Today, 08:47 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        60 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        57 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X